But consider this from a property rights perspective...what gives Page the power to hamstring Williams' property rights? To be sure, if construction activity on Williams' property impacts any structural element of Page's property, that's a direct violation of Page's property and that should be taken into account (which per the article, is probably why workers can't use a backhoe and have to use shovels). Beyond that, classical liberals would say "build away, Mr. Williams."
As for the "harassment," yea...Williams sounds like a real piece of work (though I find it funny that Jimmy is upset by the music of other bands) and I don't condone his behavior. But I find it hard to have sympathy for an old man who had sex with a 14-year old back in the day.
Page’s arguement is that he lives in a Class 1 property which is historical landmark status in Britain. Williams mansion is not , its an ordinary mansion.
Williams is digging underground very near the property and actually disturbing the foundation. Its actually causing the Tower House hallways to require support and walls having to be reinforced. it is costing page construction costs to keep sections from crumbling due to instable foundation.
The person who designed that house is considered Britains Frank Loyd Wright. Anything he is associated with becomes protected status.