Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First direct view of an electron's short, speedy trip across a border
Phys.org ^ | February 11, 2019 | Glennda Chui, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Posted on 02/11/2019 3:12:17 PM PST by ETL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: ETL

Undocumented electron.


21 posted on 02/11/2019 8:45:13 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PIF

You wouldn’t happen to have a good book to recommend on the others would you? I’ve been looking for a decent one that covered them for some time but can only find additional work on the 4.


22 posted on 02/12/2019 6:35:32 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reed13k
There, as far as I know, only a few copies of Maxwell's original work - all collectors' items. Most of the only line references omit Heaviside and present the four equations as Maxwell's (which they are not).

Some references I ran across:
James Clerk Maxwell. 1856. “On Faraday’s lines of force”. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 10 (1856), pp. 27-83

James Clerk Maxwell. 1862. “On physical lines of force”. Philosophical Magazine Series 4, vol. 21 (1861), pp. 161-175, 281-291, 338-348; Philosophical Magazine Series 4, vol. 23 (1862), pp. 12-24, 85-95

James Clerk Maxwell. 1865. “A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 155 (1865), p. 459-512

This is the one I think you want to find:
James Clerk Maxwell. 1873. A Treatise on Electromagnetism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1873

Oliver Heaviside. 1894. Electrical Papers. New York and London: Macmillan & Co, 1894

23 posted on 02/12/2019 7:03:15 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Forgot to add that only in places obscure is anyone looking at the other 198 quaternions (as Maxwell called them). They are all field equations and there are few theoretical mathematicians working on them - if any.

Among the many reasons people avoid them is because they postulate the “impossible” like free energy for the ‘aether’ (see Nicola Tesla), collapsing distance - as in being able to step from one spot to another any where in the universe, instant communication over any distance, and so on.

Only ‘crackpots’ believe any of this is possible and so it is a career ending path and avoided (filed under ‘consensus thinking’); “we already know everything and it is just a matter of filling in the details”, is another way to put it - a popular science theology in the 1950-60s.

you can also try:
The Man Who Changed Everything
The Life of James Clerk Maxwell
by Basil Mahonr

and:
Oliver Heaviside
The Life, Work, and Times of an Electrical Genius of the Victorian Age
by Paul J Nahin


24 posted on 02/12/2019 7:15:58 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Outstanding! Thank you!


25 posted on 02/12/2019 7:46:49 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson