[Windflier]

So its your opinion. I thought for a minute you knew something, you stated it so firmly.

Given sufficient evidence, one doesn't have to be witness to a crime to know the truth of it.

In this case, the available evidence and simple deductive reasoning, support my conclusion.

[bagster]

Given sufficient evidence, one doesn't have to be witness to a crime to know the truth of it. In this case, the available evidence and simple deductive reasoning, support my conclusion.

Bingo. That's exactly what I've been trying to tell you and the rest of the blue-pilled deniers for about a year now.

The difference is, I have WAY more evidence with which to base my conclusion than you do in this particular case (and better deductive reasoning skills. Nothing personal).

p.s. The available evidence doesn't support your conclusion. You forgot to factor in what was mentioned. The Lt. Governor and the A.G.

But keep trying, Windy. You'll get there.

#BabySteps

Bagster