Dear Mother of Dragons (and Dragonlets) and my beloved FReeQs,
I fell into an unexpected bunny hole near the end of the previous thread.
MN Dude posted a tweet from DJT in March 2016, a few months before his candidacy announcement the following June. MN Dude pointed out that the end of the tweet contained a “Q.”
Well now. What self-respecting FReeQ-with-shovel could resist that?
That Q was in the form of a link. I - foolishly perhaps! LOL! - followed the link. It took me to an article about crypto currency. I posted a two part exploration of that article,(plus addendum). Part one was me trying to examine and understand the implications of the DJT/Eric T tweet. Part two was the posting of an article of the loss of $145 million in crypt currency (”Vaporware,” as so aptly defined by Pete from Shawnee Mission) because of the death of the company’s leader.
I will not re-post the two parts plus addendum here on this thread, unless it is requested of me to do so. However, I thought the topic to be of possible import for discussion and current event awareness, so I will post a reply to the response from Pete from Shawnee Mission and also refer you to my previous thread posts #1747, 1752, and 1765.
The link to that thread is here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3725006/posts
The bunny hole began by me reading MN Dude’s short and innocent post (who knew???):
” https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/707226089496690688?s=19
Check out this 2016 Trump Tweet. It ends with @Q
1,663 posted on 2/6/2019, 3:58:40 PM by MNDude (WWG1WGAalso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1580 “
At the end of the two part plus addendum series, Pete in Shawnee had this comment. Rather than post a reply to him on that thread, shall reply here:
Pete posted:
TxOK!
I have never understood Cryptos fully or trusted them at all! Vaporware promises!
(Mind you I have a retirement account and what is in that do you suppose?)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Texokie’s reply:
I am not in disagreement with you, Pete from Shawnee Mission!
I am not advocating crypto currencies, although I can see perhaps in the enthusiasm of my discovery of what the @Q link led to in the tweet posted by MNDude, may suggest otherwise.... I am very suspicious of crypto currency too.
I was examining the DJT tweet with repost of Eric Trump’s link to the information about the proposed conversation about how to shape the eventual structures crypto currency will take.
I understand that the currencies the crypto currency progenitors are seeking to create are not tangible. I also like the term “Vaporware” you used. But if you think about it, the dollars in our bank accounts are not actually tangible. Banks have many more dollars on their balance sheets than they have actual dollars to cover those ledger sheet dollars. This is why they so fear the “run on the bank” scenario.
Please also note that the entire Part Two of my examination of this topic completely illustrates the “Vaporware” aspects of the system. In short, a top officer of a crypto currency company died with all the passwords and so their customers are now locked out of around $145 MILLION dollars worth of their investments in it. As I understand it the company itself is not able to access it either, so it is not embezzlement... but the situation is horrific.
I am also under no delusion that we will see crypto currencies develop. I think it is appropriate to be aware, and to perhaps even participate in the shaping, whether we participate in holding cryptos or not. I believe our kids and grandkids will certainly be faced with some form of it as a strong fixture of their economic world. I like the idea that it could be truly a crypto currency -and able to move easily from crypto to tangible. We would not want our kids facing a fake crypto currency in a controlled rigged “Vaporware” system, as is being planned by the Cabal at this time. As far as I’m concerned, we are already in a non-tangible economic reality if we have any kind of bank account, and therefore are already holding forms of “Vaporware.” We should understand the implications of this new kind of “Vaporware” which is being proposed.... and again, WHY WOULD ERIC T and our Q+ BE DIRECTING US TO THE FRAMEWORK OF A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT?
I am myself completely ignorant of how crypto currency is supposed to work, and was intrigued to find an article.....pointed to by two members of a family I trust - one of whom we know as “Q+”.... giving information of what concerns should be discussed and considered before moving our society into a crypto currency environment.
I am satisfied that move it will, whether we seniors like it or trust it or not. The two Trumps who posted that link to that article and web site seem to be soliciting their followers to at least examine the concerns they point to while this system is taking shape.
Just offering food for thought here.
My personal take away is that two Trumps, including our Q+, drew to our attention March of 2016, the need for conversation and at minimum, an awareness about crypto currencies. I am not attracted to such currencies, nor are others, I have learned, from among our band of FReeQs! But I can certainly see the need for me to pay attention and at least learn enough to follow that conversation.
But that is just me! :-D
Wishing ALL of you well!
texie
