Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MileHi
"And sometimes questions about a nominee’s lack of religious beliefs are relevant to how they will rule on certain matters."

Amen.

I know there is no Constitutional religious-test allowed, but can we at least have a "moral test"...?

527 posted on 02/08/2019 5:21:37 PM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]


To: KitJ

Problem is all morality is ultimately based on religious moral precepts.

I used to run the Moral Absolutes ping list.

Boy oh boy did some people hate that.


531 posted on 02/08/2019 5:29:23 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]

To: KitJ
...but can we at least have a "moral test"...?

That's tough, who's "morals"? But, yeah, we should be able to agree that traditional values are not extremist positions. Of course, the extreme democRats will never agree.

555 posted on 02/08/2019 7:20:13 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson