Replies

If Rowe is overturned, the decision goes back to the states. States like MA have already changed the state law to reflect the current situation. I know several others have also done that.

There is no Federal Abortion Law, as it was not in the purview of the Feds. Abortion is not in the Constitution. In fact, Roe was not defined on an abortion stance, but on a privacy issue which is not explicit in the Constitution. THAT is what any challenge will come under.

Are you saying that if (hopefully when) SCOTUS overturns Roe V Wade, that states with no restrictions abortion laws can not follow the SCOTUS decision?@@@@@@@@@@

One must remember, prior to RvW abortion was legal in some states throughout the nation. Girls would spend the summer with an ‘out of state’ aunt and return to school in the fall.

RvW made it legal in all fifty states as the ‘ Law of the Land’.

The issue has NEVER been Abortion! The issue (never taken up by the Supreme Court) is very simply the answer to “When does life begin?”

The Psalmist tells us at conception, before our parts are ever formed in our mother’s womb.

Science tells us it is when the DNA is formed uniquely, again at conception!

If the cells are not ‘Human’ wherein is the value in an embryonic stem cell? Or as put by Dr. Carson, if the parts of an aborted baby are not human, why are they harvested?

The push from the evil DS left is simply to attempt to muddy the waters. Roe doesn’t need to be overturned. A case requiring the Supreme Court to identify when life begins ( with a POTUS chosen majority) defining life at conception will render Roe and all abortion moot. One may not choose murder under the Constitution.

Prayers up!

MAGA! WWG1WGA!

I’ve read both your comments more than once trying to figure out the meaning.
Are you saying that if (hopefully when) SCOTUS overturns Roe V Wade, that states with no restrictions abortion laws can not follow the SCOTUS decision?
**************************************************************************************
I’m not sure I understood what Hostage was saying, but to answer your question, SCOTUS rules, states must follow-although it seems that California does what it darn well pleases.

My point was that back when Roe v Wade was decided, it was a supposed constitutional right that was quoted by the Supremes. Well if the Federal constitution was amended to say no abortion, child is alive at conception, etc. then the Supremes decision would have been scuttled.

> “Are you saying that if (hopefully when) SCOTUS overturns Roe V Wade, that states with no restrictions abortion laws can not follow the SCOTUS decision?”

All the state laws on abortion, reproductive health, whatever, all are based on Roe v. Wade legalizing abortion. The state laws rest on top of the 1973 US Supreme Court ruling.

When that 1973 ruling is overturned, the state laws have nothing to stand on.

So PP lawyers are writing the plan for all these states to write new laws without restriction because then they can tie up the courts for years based on 10th Amendment arguments.

Their plan is to delay, delay, resist, resist, in the hopes that somehow they get power back and return to business as usual.

IMO PP should be held accountable for trafficking in dead baby parts. There was an undercover video report two years ago that caught them in the act but PP friendly courts sealed the evidence and the media never mentions the case.

PP is Satanic. There is no question in my view.