Posted on 01/30/2019 5:52:21 PM PST by Conserv
And don’t buy into the claim coming tomorrow that he changed because of the articles, it doesn’t work that way. They had to have all this in the works for weeks in order to announce these nominees today.
Not to mention, dyed-in-the-wool NeverTrumpers. I have no idea how they survive here.
I guess Rush was suffering from this syndrome today, quoting WSJ all over the place. I kept quietly repeating to my radio, Fake News Rush. Honestly, I hate correcting Rushbo of all people..
Looks as though the WSJ lied to stir up trouble.
Funny, they (Republicans) don’t really care for conservatives. They just like to talk about how conservative they are, as they vote for moderates who lean both left & right of center. President Trump has been the most conservative presidents in my lifetime.
I’ve never seen so many fair weather supporters. POTUS has brought win after win but as soon as they hear some bs from the fake news the clutching of pearls, gnashing of teeth and hissy fits commence. Gets on my last nerve. No appreciation whatsoever for what’s been accomplished and how hard he’s fighting against these swamp creatures. I blame them for any lack of success POTUS has because they don’t have the guts or fortitude to stand their ground. I would hate to be in a foxhole with such babies.
Probably leaked by concern trolls - if they have nothing to wring their hands over, they are probably not above inventing reasons...the earlier article sure had them reenacting “Chicken Little”....again.
I believe Trump MAY have asked those two women for their input. It may have made it easier to make sure he was getting Constitutional Judges. If those two chuckleheads found a nominee acceptable they were OFF the list!
Good point. Now and then it’s not just talk, but not too hard to recognize that. I love it when he chums the water though...
Let’s not go TOO far down the “defend at all costs” road. Did Trump not say that he would NOT sign any legislation to reopen the government that didn’t include funding for the wall, then do so? That is a truthful, fair and objective criticism and it doesn’t mean that I don’t support him. Hell, I gave more to his primary and general election campaigns than I contributed to all campaigns in the prior 10 years.
I still support him, but I don’t do it with my head up my ass.
Let’s not go TOO far down the “defend at all costs” road. Did Trump not say that he would NOT sign any legislation to reopen the government that didn’t include funding for the wall, then do so? That is a truthful, fair and objective criticism and it doesn’t mean that I don’t support him. Hell, I gave more to his primary and general election campaigns than I contributed to all campaigns in the prior 10 years.
I still support him, but I don’t do it with my head up my ass.
POTUS has said Lyin’ Ryan backstabbed him on that. Promised him wall funding later and failed to deliver. Go ahead and stand with Mitch and the Beltway filth if you wish. That’s your other choice besides Trump.
Hey, pull your head out of your ass and read ALL of my post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.