This was posted yesterday and the comments indicated that the title was click-bait
How an article that was published today could have been posted yesterday is a mystery in and of itself, but why anyone would think Space.com is “click-bait” is totally beyond me.
Just did a search. It wasn’t posted yesterday. Or maybe it was removed by a moderator because of all the bogus information in the comments, such as the ridiculous claim that space.com is click bait! If so, too bad, because I’d like to know who said that so I’d be sure never to listen to him again. Probably one of the flat-earthers around here. Space.com has been used for many years on FR as a reliable source for science and astronomy articles.
Psst...you can’t believe everything you hear.
I saw your reference in comment #7 below to the Science Magazine article, vs. the Space.com article, which was indeed posted yesterday here on FR:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3723118/posts?q=1&;page=21
But there isn't a single claim in that posting either that the title is click-bait, not that I can find. Where did you get that baloney? Thanks.