Posted on 01/26/2019 7:39:24 AM PST by bray
enough brayin
The theory and process of evolution are scientific, not moral. Our problem is that we are not teaching children morality, not that they are learning science.
Science also tells us that killing babies in the womb is, in fact, killing babies. You cannot claim that science makes us immoral when you use the same science to establish exactly what the subject of the immorality (i.e. an unborn living baby) is. If it weren't for the science, the abortion question would have gone away decades ago.
First: Please have one of your most astute and patriotic DOJ legal eagles prepare a restraining order for the nearest friendly Judge to sign.
Second: Pursue this atrocity all the way to the USSC so that this despicably horrendous act of mass-murder by the State of New York can never, ever, occur!
Evolution is not science it is a belief. There is no proof of evolution and has holes large enough to drive a train through. Where are the evolving species?
Science does not prove a baby is a baby on the birthing table or in the womb. Any woman knows she is having a baby and anyone in the room can tell it is once it is born. You don’t need science for that.
Science has replaced God in the cult and why there is no morality.
Balderdascious drivel.
Bray, can you post the direct link to this page on your site and add a button so we can share on Facebook?
Really? So you believe evolution is real? Prove it.
Once they get their Nationalized HC then they can really decide who lives and dies.
Thanks Jim. I will try to get that done.
I am not on Facebook.
“Really? So you believe evolution is real? Prove it.”
—
Can you prove that it isn’t?
Both theories are unprovable-—both are beliefs.
.
good bray. thank you.
You have made progress. I hope the best for you in continuing your learning. Your evolution is not scientific. Facts underlie morals, else morals are not real.
The medical literature (which you can access at www.pubmed.gov) says otherwise. So do scientific textbooks.
The theory of evolution provides a conceptual framework which helps to interpret the observed facts, while the process of evolution is the genetic change over time that all populations experience. I do not know what "holes" you are talking about; they almost certainly come from the scam websites (e.g. Answers in Genesis) and not the scientific literature. And if you want to know where the evolving species are, just look around you. Every living thing you see is a member of an evolving--that is, changing over time--species.
Science does not prove a baby is a baby on the birthing table or in the womb. Any woman knows she is having a baby and anyone in the room can tell it is once it is born. You don’t need science for that.
Science shows us that the baby is alive and has human characteristics while within the womb. The latest efforts of the abortion promoters is to make it illegal to educate a woman about the facts of fetal development.
At conception, a zygote has all of the DNA necessary to cause the development of a human form and to drive the specific function of every tissue as soon as it differentiates. Between 3 and 5 weeks after conception, the brain forms, which gives the developing embryo awareness of its surroundings (in other words, it can feel). By 6 weeks after conception, all organs and body parts are present. From 6 weeks until birth, the parts increase in complexity and detail. These are the facts, established scientifically, which tell us that an abortion does not remove an amorphous clump of cells (as the abortionists would love to have every woman believe), but that it kills a human being. Without the science, few arguments against abortion would hold any water.
Science has replaced God in the cult and why there is no morality.
What I stated above is simply science, and is not a moral code. While morality must guide the practice of scientific exploration, science itself is morally neutral. As with most human activities, the activity is made moral or amoral by those practicing it.
No, you have to prove it for it to be true. Otherwise it is a religion and based on faith and not scientific.
So prove evolution is real.
Textbooks written by believers.
Prove that evolution is real. Holes? Name one transitional species. For evolution to be real there needs to be millions and millions of transitional species. Name one.
“No, you have to prove it for it to be true. Otherwise it is a religion and based on faith and not scientific.
So prove evolution is real.”
—
I didn’t make the claim that evolution is science-—but I still believe that it is true,in other words I have faith in the claim.
.
At least you admit it is a religion, so why not God? At least God is believable while evolution has zero chance of happening when you really look at it?
This forum is not the place for you to be enlightened.
Education requires a willingness to learn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.