Your whole argument is IRRELEVANT as the Congress has the exclusive and enumerated power to establish the uniform rule(s) of naturalization. That includes who is a natural born citizen and who is not.
If you want change, change Congress or get Congress to change the laws
“That includes who is a natural born citizen and who is not.”
Dead wrong. Why would natural born Citizens need to be naturalized?
Your argument is a fallacy. You don’t know the difference between the two different bodies of law — natural law and positive law. Look it up. Congress can only make “positive law”, i.e., man-made laws. Euler Diagram proves the fallacy of the argument that simply being “born a Citizen” of the United States is identically the same as the constitutional term “natural born Citizen”. See: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/euler-logic-diagram-shows-logical-relationship-of-constitutional-article-ii-natural-born-citizens-to-other-type-citizens-of-the-united-states/