Posted on 01/10/2019 10:13:10 PM PST by ransomnote
:: Is that who’s REALLY giving care? ::
Or maybe US Marshalls?
Or maybe USSS?
Or US MIL security?
Whoops Drb rusty should be February
Don’t know what the heck spell check was doing
There is nothing in the Emergency Authorizations Act that requires the Courts approval prior to military use.
There is no accommodation for Court approval of any military action taken by the CinC in the Constitution.
Bringing suit to stop the CinC via the courts is an act of the sedition. All persons involved, including lawyers and court members can be held accountable. And, since it is a National Emergency, they are subject to immediate arrest.
I found an article that states, RE where did RBG get treatment “Both were successfully removed at New York’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and afterwards “there was no evidence of any remaining disease”, it added.
Didn’t Q say something about where she received treatment?
This might be interesting
https://www.mskcc.org/research-programs/experimental-therapeutics
I found an article that states, RE where did RBG get treatment “Both were successfully removed at New York’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and afterwards “there was no evidence of any remaining disease”, it added.
Didn’t Q say something about where she received treatment?
This might be interesting
https://www.mskcc.org/research-programs/experimental-therapeutics
Q dropped that photo before Page’s testimony.
sounds good to me...
> “There is nothing in the Emergency Authorizations Act that requires the Courts approval prior to military use.”
I know.
But demo-dumdums have already announced such an EO would immediately be challenged.
They will shop a DC judge who will rubberstamp a TRO against POTUS’s order until the parties have been heard. Then Democrats will slow walk the TRO court hearings.
Delay Delay Delay.
Q have dropped a marker of
February 11, 2019
Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
I won’t get into it with LS or anyone else, not betting a steak dinner on it, but if that turns out to be the winner, it will be as big as sky event in Singapore and every dog has his day.
The notorious walking the streets of London pic?
Customs warriors.
:: But demo-dumdums have already announced such an EO would immediately be challenged. ::
Keep reading....
I think CinC will stand “hard-ground” on those arrests.
Longtime suspect confesses to JonBenét Ramsey murder in letters to high school classmate
> “I think CinC will stand “hard-ground” on those arrests.”
He could, yes.
But he could also win at the Supreme Court which would put a dagger through the black hearts of democrat vamps.
We’ll see.
:: Q have dropped a marker of ::
Are you using the “connected dots” from an earlier Anon post? Can you resurrect it for us here?
And, if it does come to pass...I will buy you a steak dinner...I’ll go one better, I grill you a bone-in rib eye at the location of your choice.
Have grill...will travel.
#IDon’tTYhinkI’llBeTheOnlyOne
To: bagster
The Oracle awaits input.
Goodnight, all.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Maybe the RBG/ Red Castle Green Castle are related. I went to the link of the other FR thread you posted where everyone was in lasting meltdown mode.
Someone had written “RGB” instead of “RBG,” in reference to Ruth BG.
A reply to the question of “what/who is RGB?” led someone to mention something about Red/Green.
Well duh! Red Green Builders! RBG’s exit does facilitate the building of the wall. As you said, it increases SC vote to ward off legal challenges. And the initials do have a sort of harmonious dyslexia to them!
Yes indeed. And as Cletus mentioned above Q dropped those pics before
Ms page testified
Q drops in Feb and May, but Ms Page didn’t testify untill July.
Whoopsies there goes the trolls “q is just posting open source” mantra LOL
RBG, by virtue of her staging (she’s stage IV, due to metastisis) makes her inelligible for clinical trials. Oh, wait, she’s a Supreme. For her, they’d probably make exceptions (but why??).
You win today's prize.
#1Detective
Ok, research shows that on February 11, 2018, Q dropped a post (#727) that contained only the words Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It wasn’t necessarily a marker at all.
Never mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.