[little jeremiah]

There obviously is a “Q”.

Exactly what and who that Q is, remains to be seen.

And Trump knows there’s a Q, as well.

So obviously Q exists.

But what/who is Q, is the question that should be asked, there is no doubt that Q exists. Someone is posting as Q, so Q exists.

And Trump has recognized Q’s existence.

[little jeremiah]

Press release/statement from Sen Lyndsey Graham on government shutdown & wall/border security.

“It is time for President Trump to use emergency powers to fund the construction of a border wall/barrier.

“I hope it works.”https://t.co/sCxvek9Rcr pic.twitter.com/NhxXstBnQI— Lisa Mei Crowley (@LisaMei62) January 11, 2019

[bagster]

Someone is posting as Q, so Q exists.
And Trump has recognized Q’s existence.

Absolutely.

There is enough proof on the table, so when he talks about "proving a negative" he is setting up a false argument.

He is the one trying to prove that the actual proof is not proof. The burden of proof now lies with him.

Don't anybody fall for his antics.

#WeWillNotBeTalkedDownTo

#ProveThatTheProofsAreNotProofOrSTFU

Bagster