[bagster]

Someone is posting as Q, so Q exists.
And Trump has recognized Q’s existence.

Absolutely.

There is enough proof on the table, so when he talks about "proving a negative" he is setting up a false argument.

He is the one trying to prove that the actual proof is not proof. The burden of proof now lies with him.

Don't anybody fall for his antics.

#WeWillNotBeTalkedDownTo

#ProveThatTheProofsAreNotProofOrSTFU

Bagster

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

Despite my Theory re the trolls descending on this thread right before a BOOM or Q blizzard not to mention the “recommendation” that we just ignore ‘em, I was really struggling to keep from teeing off on someone today.

Sigh. So much energy just to waste people’s time and try to disrupt.

Please pass my thanks along to JR for knocking off that other food fight as well.

I’m hittin’ the sack.

[little jeremiah]

The only honest and useful question it this:

“Is Q who/what he says he is (a group of Trump advisors including Trump, mostly mil), or Q lying and really something/someone else?”

That is the actual question.