It appears that Jeff Sessions chose to ignore it. Although I suppose there is some outside chance that there is some investigation going on in the background somewhere. It seems unlikely. 8 months is a long time. Oh, it APPEARS that way, huh?
Because "eight months is a long time"?
You are a crack detective, derpy. We're lucky to have you on the case.
#IAmJacksInsideInformation
If the blatant attempt to harnass the CIA, FBI, NSA and White House National Security apparatus...
You really haven't been paying attention at all, have you Jacky boy.
Based on your above quote, I'm assigning you to the remedial Q training course. Some basics must be understood in order for you to pass the course.
p.s. What do you make of LS stating that there have been no Congressional referrals other than McCabe in light of those obvious criminal referrals I (and Q) posted?
Is it plausible that he wasn't aware of it but we/Q were? Mr. "inside information"?
Or do you think he was aware and "conveniently" forgot to mention it?
There are only two options here.
Either he didn't know about it or is lying and pretending not to know. Either option is troubling to his reputation, yes?
You behave similarly, with all due respect.
Bagster
Answering your question:
What do you make of LS stating that there have been no Congressional referrals other than McCabe in light of those obvious criminal referrals I (and Q) posted?
Is it plausible that he wasn't aware of it but we/Q were? Mr. "inside information"?
Or do you think he was aware and "conveniently" forgot to mention it?
It's proven that he wasn't aware of it and you and Q were. The comment chain demonstrates that.
I assume LS is acting in good faith with his comments. I therefore assume he missed the news of the referrals. Maybe he wasn't paying attention to this story last April.
Anyone who reads Q's posts has a lot of knowledge about the Deep State Coup, as well as other topics. Q feeds his readers in several ways, the original Socratic method "What does X mean?" is the most common. Other posts are puzzles, like the pictures. Those types are both difficult and require 'decoding', but to someone trying to get caught up with things, unless they are willing to invest a lot of time (like read a bunch of the links Ransomnote provides) much of that is going to be impenetrable.
You and the others who are good at the puzzles and have followed this daily for a year were watching decode videos, reading sights like Neon Revolt and Praying Medic and others in real time as the posts happened.
It would be hard to duplicate your knowledge if you started very late in the game.
And even then, some people are way better at decoding and puzzles than others.
But Q does go ahead and post links to news stories and official documents some of the time. (10% ?). Those are my favorite of his posts, because I like references better than puzzles. (IE: my "fact based" tables were all linked with publicly available news and primary source documents)
If LS had dilligently gone through the Q posts and only focused on the ones with links he would still have known about this. So, even leaving aside puzzle solving skills, you are correct that Q followers know things because of Q that he did not. Case closed.
However the knowledge about the referrals is not one of Q's "inside information" posts.
Q posted #1683 on the 24th of July. It was linking to a document that was released on the 18th April. Q was not revealing something that people closely following the Deep State Coup story from non-Q angles were not aware of. It was reported on April 18 by Fox, CNN, NPR, etc.
I was certainly aware of those referrals at the time they were made, so Q's post on them three months later was not news to me.
I'm not that familiar with LS's posting history here.
I guess I don't find it particularly troubling if he didn't no a fact and mis-stated something. If it was deliberate it would be troubling, absolutely. But most people have holes in their knowledge about this story - which has a lot of players and dimensions.
I'm even behind on who Mueller has put in jail, and that was primary focus of mine. (He got a couple more guilty pleas late in the year, I haven't incorporated them into may table.)
I claim no special knowledge of anything. Did LT? If so I am skeptical. Which, at least makes me consistent.
BTW: You know I did review "Q Proofs" a while ago, and try to look at them when they are posted. The best "Q proof" that fascinates me are the letters at the GHWB funeral.
Jeb looked like he saw a ghost. The entire thing was weird, with some people getting the little invitations. I have no alternate plausible explanation for it, other than "they were all given some very bad news by note".
They sure weren't invitations to the after-party.
Because "eight months is a long time"?People are impatient but these things take time.
I was a senior manager in a medium sized company where one of the vice presidents was stealing major unit inventory(Motorcycles)from the distribution warehouse and selling them out of state. It took me six months to assemble enough hard evidence to go to the president of the company. It took another two years before the VP was called into a meeting and introduced to two detectives from the white collar crime unit and two uniformed officers who took him away in handcuffs.
That was just one officer of the corporation, one department manager and a couple of truck and forklift drivers. Not very complex at all yet it took almost three years to bring the guy down (And the underlings all walked away clean).
I'm impatient too, but it is going to take time to do it right.