Your new names include:
Limpy McDerperson
Derpy McLimperson
Mr Limp-it
Limpy Noir
Dim Bulb McLimpy
Lorum Limpy
Ipsum Limperson
That guy gives girls the creeps
What do you make of LS stating that there have been no Congressional referrals other than McCabe in light of those obvious criminal referrals I (and Q) posted?
Is it plausible that he wasn't aware of it but we/Q were? Mr. "inside information"?
Or do you think he was aware and "conveniently" forgot to mention it?
It's proven that he wasn't aware of it and you and Q were. The comment chain demonstrates that.
I assume LS is acting in good faith with his comments. I therefore assume he missed the news of the referrals. Maybe he wasn't paying attention to this story last April.
Anyone who reads Q's posts has a lot of knowledge about the Deep State Coup, as well as other topics. Q feeds his readers in several ways, the original Socratic method "What does X mean?" is the most common. Other posts are puzzles, like the pictures. Those types are both difficult and require 'decoding', but to someone trying to get caught up with things, unless they are willing to invest a lot of time (like read a bunch of the links Ransomnote provides) much of that is going to be impenetrable.
You and the others who are good at the puzzles and have followed this daily for a year were watching decode videos, reading sights like Neon Revolt and Praying Medic and others in real time as the posts happened.
It would be hard to duplicate your knowledge if you started very late in the game.
And even then, some people are way better at decoding and puzzles than others.
But Q does go ahead and post links to news stories and official documents some of the time. (10% ?). Those are my favorite of his posts, because I like references better than puzzles. (IE: my "fact based" tables were all linked with publicly available news and primary source documents)
If LS had dilligently gone through the Q posts and only focused on the ones with links he would still have known about this. So, even leaving aside puzzle solving skills, you are correct that Q followers know things because of Q that he did not. Case closed.
However the knowledge about the referrals is not one of Q's "inside information" posts.
Q posted #1683 on the 24th of July. It was linking to a document that was released on the 18th April. Q was not revealing something that people closely following the Deep State Coup story from non-Q angles were not aware of. It was reported on April 18 by Fox, CNN, NPR, etc.
I was certainly aware of those referrals at the time they were made, so Q's post on them three months later was not news to me.
I'm not that familiar with LS's posting history here.
I guess I don't find it particularly troubling if he didn't no a fact and mis-stated something. If it was deliberate it would be troubling, absolutely. But most people have holes in their knowledge about this story - which has a lot of players and dimensions.
I'm even behind on who Mueller has put in jail, and that was primary focus of mine. (He got a couple more guilty pleas late in the year, I haven't incorporated them into may table.)
I claim no special knowledge of anything. Did LT? If so I am skeptical. Which, at least makes me consistent.
BTW: You know I did review "Q Proofs" a while ago, and try to look at them when they are posted. The best "Q proof" that fascinates me are the letters at the GHWB funeral.
Jeb looked like he saw a ghost. The entire thing was weird, with some people getting the little invitations. I have no alternate plausible explanation for it, other than "they were all given some very bad news by note".
They sure weren't invitations to the after-party.
Your new names include:
Limpy McDerperson
Derpy McLimperson
Mr Limp-it
Limpy Noir
Dim Bulb McLimpy
Lorum Limpy
Ipsum Limperson
That guy gives girls the creeps
FWIW
I went back through all of LS’s postings to the “Q” threads from the beginning.
LS doesn’t want to be ping’d on anything “Q” related. He will respond to non “Q” stuff on a “Q” thread.
He had and has been consistent. He pretty much has\had no confidence\use in\for “Q” from the get-go.
He was usually responding to a “slide” subject, mostly about elections.
I probably should ping him cause I used his name, however...