https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/01/cnn-knows-mueller-has-nothing-on-donald.html
CNN knows Mueller has nothing on The Donald
CNN worked with Obama to set up Donald John Trump and saddle him with an unwarranted investigation. Obama used an intelligence briefing to slip some memos into the stack of papers given to the president-elect.
Those memos were part of a Russian Dossier — opposition research that Obama and Hillary paid millions for.
On January 10, 2017, CNN reported, “Intel chiefs presented Trump with claims of Russian efforts to compromise him,” under a quadruple byline that included Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein, anchor Jake Tapper, and reporters Evan Perez and Jim Sciutto.
We later learned that CNN staffers met with Obama’s team to figure out a way to make this dossier news. That was how they did it. CNN got the “exclusive/only on CNN” because they cut a deal with Obama.
There was nothing in the dossier.
It was as empty as the empty suit Obama.
Nevertheless, CNN reported, “The allegations were presented in a two-page synopsis that was appended to a report on Russian interference in the 2016 election. The allegations came, in part, from memos compiled by a former British intelligence operative, whose past work US intelligence officials consider credible. The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.”
Huh? Allegations “which are based primarily on information from Russian sources.”
The real collusion was between Russian spies and Democrats.
But CNN and Obama got their special counsel.
As the investigation drags on, CNN knows Bungling Bob Mueller has nothing on President Trump.
CNN reported, “What happens if Mueller comes up empty?”
The short answer: They will still blame the victim of Obama’s wiretapping of Trump Tower and Mueller’s corrupt, strong-armed investigation.
The column ended, “If there was no collusion and no obstruction, the irony is that Trump could have avoided all of this — the damage to the rule of law and to his presidency — by cooperating fully and letting Mueller’s probe run its course. If future presidents take any lesson away from Trump, let us hope it is this one.”
Never mind that President Trump fully cooperated with this witch hunt. That’s the spin. Sure, you were not guilty but you tweeted bad things — so you deserve it.
Someday, history may tell the truth about this pile of manure investigation.
Till then, you are stuck with me speaking out.
The Great Wall of America Will Break the Democrats
By Rich Logis
FTA:
The Wall will be the physical affirmation of our historic, theory of black swan, glass-ceiling shattering 2016 win over Empress Clinton. Tax reform and withdrawals from bogus deals with Iran and climate change globalist welfare treaties aren’t palpable; I can’t take a selfie in front of the 2018 Tax Cuts & Jobs Act. United States Supreme Court justices are a bit more tangible, but the court isn’t omnipresent 24/7.
The Wall, though? That proposed happy marriage of steel, spikes, and concrete? Oh, it will be glorious. I know that President Trump has described The Wall as “beautiful,” but we don’t care if it’s the ugly Christmas sweater of American architecture.
The Wall Will Save Lives and Money
Want to know how padded rubber room-inducing The Wall is for Democrats? Trump has convinced fiscal conservatives to spend money, and Democrats have talked about saving money, as evidenced here and here.
The Wall is Mount Rushmore and AR-15s and Confederate statues and the Electoral College and the Gadsden flag all in one. It is a watchtower, a monument to sovereignty, an homage to citizens, law enforcement officers, all Americans who have to worry about not only American criminals murdering them, but those here illegally as well. Ignore the Democrats and Ben Sasses of America, who prattle on about “xenophobia”; fear and greed are the bases for every decision made by the Homo sapiens species. Am I afraid of crimes being committed against me and my family from those who shouldn’t be here? Damn right, I am, and if most of the spineless politicians in Washington acted a bit more fearful, Kate Steinle, Mollie Tibbetts, and Ronil Singh would likely be alive. Singh, a California police officer killed by an illegal alien in the line of duty last week, emigrated from Fiji, a country I bet is safer than the Golden State.
I wouldn’t care if “only” one person died annually from illegal immigration, and I would care not if “only” one illegal border crossing occurred annually; the cult of the Democrats’ gun confiscation sales pitch has always been “if it saves one life.” If they believe that, vote to fund The Wall and end the government shutdown. If The Wall saves one life (it’ll save many more), and saves even the smallest percentage of the annual $116-billion illegal alien financial burden, then break ground today. Just keep reiterating this to all your Democrat friends and relatives: “but if it saves one life,” “but if it saves one life,” “ but if it...”
And GOP, you listening? Especially you zealously open-borders Tessio Republicans, who have continued to betray your voters the way Sal Tessio betrayed the Corleone family in The Godfather?
The Democrats know that The Wall will work spectacularly well. The Beto knows it. Fugaziahontas, Elizabeth Warren, knows it. Kuckoo Kamala Harris knows it; so does Gay Sex Goon Cory Booker (I gave him this moniker after he interrogated Mike Pompeo about gay sex during his secretary of state confirmation hearings earlier this year). Joey B to the I to the D-E-N? Affirmative. The Wall will accelerate the cannibalization within the Democratic Party, between establishment Dems, who are mostly covert Leninists, and the new-school Dems, who are unabashedly open about their collectivist fetish. The Wall is the Bolsheviks overthrowing Tsar Nicholas II, and it will usher in the Democrats’ version of the Russian Revolution. It will be a sight to behold. Recommended viewing beverage is a Build That Wall cocktail. Yes, such a drink exists.
The entrenched Washingtonian Democratic and Republican parties can’t stand the fact that a reality television star president will do more to curb illegal immigration and the ills it has begotten than all their combined lousy efforts.
How much will The Wall cost? A lot of moola; $25 billion, maybe more. Is it worth it? Sure is. Am I concerned that Mexico won’t pay for it? Nope.
Admittedly, I’m not thrilled about all aspects of The Wall, such as the expected eminent domain, which could displace hundreds of landowners. Since these property-owners will be an integral part of history, let’s compensate them with triple their market value.
The Wall Makes or Breaks 2020
The Wall is a black and white policy issue for Trump. He knows he can’t cave to the Democrats. If he acquiesces, read my lips: Clinton will be the 2020 Democrat nominee, and she will win.
But worry not. The Wall is Fort Sumter; there’s no going back from it now.
The Wall isn’t anti-immigrant; in fact, it might be the most pro-immigrant expenditure in American history – a ubiquitous reminder that America is the most generous nation in the history of the world – which admits two legal immigrants every minute of every day and will welcome with open arms those who adhere to our rule of law. Nationalism is the glue that holds this whole American experiment together.
Some presidents wants freeways, hospitals, and airports named after them. Not our president. The Donald J. Trump Great Wall of America is what he wants, and it’s what the majority of people in the majority of states want. Time to get this “elections have consequences” party started.
Build that wall along all 2,000 miles on the southern border, Mr. President. Build it high, build it wide, build it tall, as tall as the sky. Our only regret about The Wall will be that it’s not visible from outer space.
What happened to the written answers that DJT gave to Meuller? Never heard a word about them. Guess there was no “THERE” there.
The FBI is investigating the credibility and accuracy of these allegations, which are based primarily on information from Russian sources, but has not confirmed many essential details in the memos about Mr. Trump.”
**************************************************************************************
PURE BS. I watched CNN for this reporting. Wolfie and crew were hyping how credible the source was. blah blah blah. Making it seem like it was 100% true.
In a way, Buzz Feed did a service by dropping the whole steaming pile. As soon as people read it, any one with half a brain knew it was Bat Guano Crazy Crap Sandwich.
good post. CNN sucks.