1 posted on
01/04/2019 1:43:21 AM PST by
vannrox
To: SunkenCiv
It’s a very interesting read. I think.
2 posted on
01/04/2019 1:43:54 AM PST by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: vannrox
What’s with the “CE” bull$hit?
I thought that stuff was stopped years ago.
3 posted on
01/04/2019 3:17:54 AM PST by
laweeks
To: vannrox
Good article, though as I was reading at the very very end I realize the last two paragraphs had been copied and pasted twice in vannrox article.
4 posted on
01/04/2019 3:38:45 AM PST by
ReformedBeckite
(1 of 3 I'm only allowing my self each day)
To: vannrox
5 posted on
01/04/2019 3:50:32 AM PST by
teppe
To: vannrox
Humm it appears that it was taxes that broke the backs of the Jews figuratively and probably in some cases literally.
The Jews should of listen to Jesus words in Mark 12:17
"And Jesus said to them, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." And they were amazed at Him.(NASB)
6 posted on
01/04/2019 3:53:44 AM PST by
ReformedBeckite
(1 of 3 I'm only allowing my self each day)
To: vannrox
I find it interesting that Jesus predicted the fall of Jerusalem, and specifically the temple 40 years from his prediction of it, in the woes against the pharisees,(See the chapter of Matthew 24 were Jesus talks about the destruction of the Temple to his disciples right after he gave the woes against the Pharisees.)
A Biblical generation is considered to be 40 years, I also find it interesting that 40 years to the day passed from the time Jesus told his disciples the temple would be destroyed or from another point like his death on the cross, I'm not sure when the counting of the 40 years start for I have lost that reference I read somewhere else, but I think you all get the idea.
7 posted on
01/04/2019 4:22:34 AM PST by
ReformedBeckite
(1 of 3 I'm only allowing my self each day)
To: vannrox
11 posted on
01/04/2019 5:12:02 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
To: vannrox
Great Sieges: Jerusalem (70 CE AD 70)...
In the 60s CE AD a financial crisis forced Rome to raise the taxes throughout the empire.
Titus began the siege of Jerusalem in 66 CE AD 66.
Despite the fortifications of the city, Titus decided to attack the city in February of 66 CE AD 66...
FIFY
To: vannrox
It was AD70 not this CE/BCE nonsense.
15 posted on
01/04/2019 5:44:09 AM PST by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: vannrox
Bought this Avalon Hill board wargame years ago. Have played it several times as both the Romans and the Jewish defenders. Moderately difficult as the Romans and near impossible as the Jews.
Also read the description of the Jewish Rebellion by Josephus ...
And, no ... not the Josephus from "History of the World, Part 1" ...
17 posted on
01/04/2019 5:52:05 AM PST by
BlueLancer
(Orchides Forum Trahite - Cordes Et Mentes Veniant)
To: vannrox
To: vannrox
To: vannrox
33 posted on
01/06/2019 5:37:21 AM PST by
Mr170IQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson