Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jpsb
Assuming a conventional warhead or a kinetic warhead:

1) You would have to detect and accurately know the precise coordinates of the target from 300 miles away, and do so before launch.

B) The mach 6 missile would have to be able to detect the exact location of the target while traveling at, well, mach 6. Atmospheric heating around the missile would preclude the use of infrared sensors for target detection, and ionization of the air around the missile would preclude the use of active radar for target detection. So how is the missile going to determine the corrections necessary for a hit?

III) Assuming that the missile does have a means for terminal detection of the target, at mach 6 there isn't much course correction maneuvering the missile can do, so we're back to 1) above, you need a near perfect firing solution before launch.

Which all boils down to a missile that is more suited for a nuclear first strike, not conventional warfare.

105 posted on 12/28/2018 7:21:38 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Well these missiles are built for aircraft carriers. So I would imagine there would be an enemy submarine in the area providing guidance info. Enjoyed the exchange. Later.


106 posted on 12/28/2018 7:31:20 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson