Great one! Thank you so much. I'm much obliged FRiend.
SS1
Posted on 12/26/2018 10:08:01 PM PST by ransomnote
Great one! Thank you so much. I'm much obliged FRiend.
SS1
https://twitter.com/JeffLee2020/status/1025541620693970945
real pictures of the bathroom where HRC’s server was...
Fillibuster rule... could be eliminated... ❓️ McConnell
re:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3715518/posts?page=279#279
Did you and JimRob go to the same “there must be a nice way of saying this...” college???
So you hang your hope of not being a liar on the word "seems", eh?
Well, that seems a bit Clintonian to me, but let me just say this. Opinions can be lies just as easily as statements of fact.
There's no wiggling out of this one, Jackie Slick.
But let me play Slick Willy for a second, since that's your game. I didn't call you a liar. I called your "opinion" a lie (which it is) and admonished you to stop spreading lies.
Unless you believe that somebody who spreads lies is in fact a liar?
I guess you could be right.
Try to respond to people without name calling, you are better than that.
I tried real hard. When I was twelve.
Didn't work. So here I am.
#GetUsedToIt
#NotBetterThanThat
#IThoughtYouKnew
(see tagline for further information)
Bagster
Thank you Jim. And thank you for letting us have the Q thread. We are all most appreciative I can assure you!
Whoa!!!!!!!!
...and mentions that Hildy's server was copied on Weiner's laptop. I keep wondering what is the fate of that laptop... lost in the ether.
I’m breaking my ixnay ollstray rule to point out how ironic is is that Jackie-soi posted JUST ABOVE JimRob’s admonition to Sham-wow...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Hey Bagster, you called me a liar,..
278 posted on 12/27/2018, 6:18:52 PM by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To: Uncle Sham
It’s not a matter of debate or dissent. I just don’t appreciate the insults and resulting flamewars, so it’s best (IMHO) to try to keep q stuff off our regular threads and non-q posters off the q threads. Thanks for trying to appreciate my concerns and for humoring me on this.
279 posted on 12/27/2018, 6:20:13 PM by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 |
Re: Trolls
HEAR!!! HEAR!!! GREAT advice from TheTexasMom I just hope and pray people will do what you said. I don’t care how clever they think they are, when Freepers answer a troll, they just add to everybody’s aggravation. Ignore them, or private reply to them...so simple and effective
Thanks for your post 138. Darlin’ and I are reeling. But not as much as we would have been a year ago.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5668542-Memorandum-in-Opposition.html
An alleged Russian troll farm, which has been indicted by Robert Mueller, said in a court filing Thursday that the special counsel has “obtained a nude selfie” as part of his investigation.
The company, Concord Management and Consulting, filed a motion in court that claimed Mueller is unlawfully keeping materials away from it — and casually mentioned the existence of a lewd photo.
It was not clear Thursday where the alleged nude pic came from or who had taken it.
The company’s lawyer, Eric Dubelier, made the striking allegations while criticizing Mueller’s tight hold on information in the sprawling Russia probe.
“Could the manner in which he collected a nude selfie really threaten the national security of the United States?” Dubelier wrote in the memo.
Nice
Thurs,
Found a blurb on Neon Revolt’s thread @ Gab, that
Guccifer 2.0 not only wasn’t Russian or Romanian, but he was likely an op by Crowdstrike. So I checked out the link. Below is an excerpt and link. Article is very long:
“It is a severely under-appreciated point that, despite having access to John Podesta’s attachments and other documents (and releasing thousands of files), Guccifer 2.0 somehow managed to avoid releasing anything that was damaging to the reputations of Podesta, Hillary Clinton or the Democratic party’s leadership.
None of the material Guccifer 2.0 published had a negative impact on Clinton’s campaign, (though the persona’s access to documents suggests its operator would have had the capability to do so). Even the documents given to Aaron Nevins made zero impact on the General Election in relevant states.
On the other hand, Guccifer 2.0 did manage to very effectively smear the public perception of the DNC leaks and Podesta emails as published by WikiLeaks, and to generate headlines expressing outrage that funneled attention away from their contents.
Without arguing attribution at all, one could draw the conclusion the party which most benefitted from the actions of Guccifer 2.0 – even a Russian Guccifer 2.0 – was, in fact, the Hillary Clinton campaign.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-12-25/guccifer-20-game-over-year-end-review-0
NOTE: A SIDE ISSUE: When I used microsoft e, I was reading the article at zero hedge, and after a paragraph, it redirected to some sort of ad. I couldn’t close it, so just closed the browser, and started over.
This time, the page would not come up, and bing kept intruding with the message that it couldn’t be reached. I try to avoid bing, but lately it has been popping up-seeming to challenge my homepage msn.com.
So I switched to firefox to post this link. Makes me wonder why bing didn’t work.
Actually, real reporters did. But they operate out of 8Chan, FR, and a host of internet sites and U-Tubers - all unrelated to the PRAVDA Deep State Media whose sock puppets once upon a time used to be called "reporters".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.