Posted on 12/23/2018 8:58:07 AM PST by simpson96
While the president is be staying behind in Washington DC to deal with the government shutdown, Kimberly Guilfoyle is making herself at home in Mar-a-Lago to celebrate her first Christmas with the Trumps.
The former Fox News host took to Instagram to post photos of herself, new beau Donald Trump Jr and the president at the White House as she reflected on her 'many blessings' from this year.
'Merry Christmas and #HappyHolidays to you and your loved ones ... reflecting on all of our many blessings and so grateful Wishing you healthy and Happy Holidays! God Bless you and your families!,' she wrote.
Some of Guilfoyle's snaps included photos of her and Don Jr taken at last week's White House Christmas Party, which saw Trump officials - past and present - in attendance.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I think Don tarnished it when he cheated on his wife.
“She is trash and will eventually tarnish the good Trump name - simple as that.”
PawPaw Trump is a well documented womanizer and seems to have passed the trait on to his son. Many dynamic men are womanizers, They are also great leaders. So the “good name” depends on what side of Trump you are referring to. I like the Leader side but think the womanizer side actually tarnishes the good name. It’s something to overlook and put up with for the trade off.
LOL!
Nobody cares.
She’s basically a Kardashian, would fit right in with that family.
If that is true, then that is a problem. A HUGE PROBLEM!
That attitude is why we got the Kenyan usurper!!
Dang. Don, Jr. is an anchor baby, too.
Um NO
I don’t think there is a social stigma issue like that anymore. Clearly, his marriage with Vanessa was over.
Oh no not this again. He was born in the United States to a American father. We are a nation on immigrants. The games some people play.
No she looks just like a Chilean sea bass I caught a few years back
I am not playing a game, unless you think that the constitution and original intent is horse play.
What time are you living in the 1900’s. This is the new reality like it or not.
Large behinds are fashionable right now. Unfortunately for me that trend is about 25 years too late! LOL
Point well taken.
However, these women are not exactly saints either. Those women who have affairs with rich and powerful married men are culpable as well. They know what they are doing with no regard to how it hurts the wife or ultimately breaks up the family.
There would be no womanizer without the gold digger.
If his mother’s nation of birth does not make a jus sanguinis claim of citizenship upon children born abroad of it’s citizens, then the only nationality Don, Jr. has is that of his father therefore he would be determined to be natural born if challenged in a court of law, in my opinion. If his mother’s nation of birth did make a jus sanguinis claim of citizenship upon Don, Jr. then he is not.
Ivanka Trump, a former Czechoslovakian national was lawfully resident in the US when Don Jr. was born. Czech citizenship law follows the principle of jus sanguinis, used to determine eligibility for citizenship, as is typical in Europe. Any person born to a Czech citizen is a Czech citizen at birth. Whether the person is born in the Czech Republic or elsewhere is irrelevant. What natural born citizen is born with multiple citizenships? It does not matter that Don Jr. does not and did not want it. Czech citizenship law is just as valid as our own. Our laws are the same as theirs in that regard.
Again, Don Jr. is a citizen, no doubt. He is NOT an Article II, section 1, clause 5 natural born citizen eligible for the POTUS.
(All trees are plants. Not all plants are trees)
“Again, Don Jr. is a citizen, no doubt. He is NOT an Article II, section 1, clause 5 natural born citizen eligible for the POTUS.”
I agree with the strict interpretation of the constitution, Article II.
However, that ship sailed with the election of the Kenyan Usurper and is sadly now over the horizon.
I wish it wasn’t so but the reality is the coronation of Obama twice put an end to the strict interpretation.
Please Note: I am not a lawyer, have never portrayed one on stage or screen and have never stayed at a Holiday Inn Express...just my tuppence.
So you agree that foreign law determines the meaning of the US Constitution?
The US Constitution dictates that no individual subject to a foreign power can be President. The manner by which an individual can be subject to a foreign power varies by circumstance, location and laws of that foreign power. Why is that so difficult?
As a practical matter, I fear that you are correct. I admit to naively hoping for a SCOTUS with the integrity to adjudicate this important matter with constitutional integrity.
I can dream, can’t I?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.