Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
AND because Flynn did not have a lawyer present...

Yeah, shouldn't the have read him his "Miranda rights"? You know, telling him that anything he said could and would be used against him?!

1,280 posted on 12/12/2018 6:20:56 PM PST by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1276 | View Replies ]


To: amorphous

Yeah, shouldn’t the have read him his “Miranda rights”? You know, telling him that anything he said could and would be used against him?!
******************************************************************************
And just as important, you have the right to remain silent!


1,317 posted on 12/12/2018 7:06:39 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1280 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Miranda rights must be read only when one is being placed under arrest, or is under arrest and being questioned. Police and law enforcement are always allowed to ask questions when investigating a possible crime. I would have to double check the case law to see if someone who is a target of an investigation must be mirandized. (I don’t practice criminal law so my knowledge dates back to school and the bar exam, and maybe some reading since then.)

So, generally, no, you don’t have to read someone like Flynn his Miranda rights to speak with him, as the FBI agents knew. However, if the agents went in there with the intent to trap Flynn in a lie and then to use that to get him fired and/or prosecuted, as seems to be the case, then there may be some grounds to require that he have been read his Miranda rights.


1,325 posted on 12/12/2018 7:23:11 PM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson