If one has the time, simply explain, as best you can, what you know in a respectful manner. Doing this enlightens other readers as well, and is far more effective than deriding someone, even a troll, for asking what may seem a staged question to those knowledgeable of Q.
_______________________________________________
Q asks us to learn and research for ourselves so that when the MSM or other liars try to deceive us, we’ve seen the data/research ourselves and know the truth.
Many of us have had over a year of experience responding to questions, and we’ve learned that offering to point questioners in the right direction with links, tweets, and videos is better than patiently explaining in depth. Those unwilling to look into the content to which we point are probably not genuinely interested.
Visitors will develop greater confidence in the data if they’ve reviewed it themselves and do not receive distillations from others. Directly connecting people with information has proven to result in the best thread environment.
I’m trying to put together a Frequently Asked Questions table so that thread regulars do not need to reconstruct from the ground up explanations given previously, but can instead point to or copy/paste answers in the table. For those wishing to provide extended or “patient” answers, I recommend using private messaging to correspond.
Historically, it's teachers who've become the most knowledgeable about a subject, through teaching it, not by directing others to information so that they may learn on their own, though that too is a very important part of the process.
Below is an example of an instance where I practiced what I'm preaching:
Q Anon: 12/01/18 Trust Trump's Plan
12/2/2018, 6:34:31 PM · 186 of 2,082<
amorphous to xxxxxxxxxx
...what is the point of talking in code like some sort of middle school kid with a decoder ring?
It's because of whatever position in our government Q holds, a position some say requires Q level clearance, he/she/they are unable to reveal information which many at best will construed as sensitive/classified and illegal to reveal.
This is why Q MUST present things the public needs to know as a question, open source leads, & etc.
Apologies for the shortness of my fellow QFers. It's a fine line between answering a question, which is a tactic trolls use to waste our time, or being snarky, which dissuades trolls, but also turns away those who are honestly looking to learn more about Q.
For more info:
Q - The Plan To Save The World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cYZ8dUgPuU
I like to think I presented things in a different light which maybe was easier for the individual to understand. I also like to think others may happen upon my minor post and to learn why Q comms are the way they are.
The person was either satisfied with my answer, or left, because they never responded back. It allowed me to flesh out my thoughts and future responses, concerning the subject, as well.
::I’m trying to put together a Frequently Asked Questions table so that thread regulars do not need to reconstruct from the ground up explanations given previously, but can instead point to or copy/paste answers in the table.::
.....
Great idea!