The depraved stupidity of Krugman.
I see the NYT finally got up to speed on the latest DEM talking point memo.
Solar cycle denial is a thousand times worse.
No one is denying that the climate in different areas around the planet is changing.
What we are denying is the claim that if we give all our money to the ruling elite, that they can then keep it from changing.
>>The Trump administration is, it goes without saying, deeply anti-science.
Ask this dood about when life begins. Does passing through the birth canal become “a magic transformation”? Are c-section babies not really alive?
Ask this dood about chromosomes and men and women.
Ask this dood how global climate change causes earthquakes and arson.
Sure it did. It's only Monday, and the news is already gone. Only the HuffPost is still talking about it
Is Krugman a climate scientist?
Yes. They practice selective science
There is climate change. The problem lies in how is the climate changing. It is the Maunder Minimum leading us into a little ice age
The depravity of ignoring long term natural cycles in solar activity, earth magnetic pole rotation, and changing macro climates; of assuming without proof that short-term climate variation must be man-made; and of clandestinely adjusting surface temperature measurement data in order to support pre-determined popular theories to permit Statists to justify a new Global authority and impose over and dictate to sovereign nations; over-riding the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights and its internal taxing schemes:
That is Mega Depravity!
The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite. -- From President Dwight D. Eisenhower's farewell speech
Was Eisenhower warring us about the likes of Al Gore and the leftist political agenda of the United Nation's Global Warming panel?
The science isn't settled and there are plenty of scientist who's voices aren't offered in the mainstream media, because the mainstream media has bought into global warming mythology offered by the scientific elitist and has come under the spell of climate change cultist. Even with the lack of hard core scientific facts to back up their soothsaying predictions, the left of center press continues to ignore opposing conclusions.
The closing sentence: “Republicans don’t just have bad ideas; at this point, they are, necessarily, bad people.”
From the so-called economist who confidently predicted that the economy would crash “forever” under DJT.
He’s not only a climate scientist but THE great judge of good and evil.
Climate change hysterics should have to answer the question: “How many people should die in order to avoid climate catastrophe?” Because if their plans are implemented, people will indeed die. People die because energy is too expensive every day. Mostly in the Third World.
Oh look.
An article from the paper which promotes genocide.
Do a search for Global Cooling, it’s what REAL SCIENCE is talking about today....
Which is why the Warmers are ramping up their fake science.
They know they are soon to be silenced by the facts!!!
NYT calls decades of insane forestry management allowing debris accumulation a “failure to rake the leaves”. And we’re anti-science?
The Depravity of Anti-American, Anti-Domestic-Competition Schemes
Down with globalism! More Manufacturing on U.S. soil! MAGA!
Yep. They politicize everything.
No one is denying that climate changes. It has over and over and over again since the beginning of the Earth. We all learn about it when studying glaciation, the formation of the Great Lakes and Finger Lakes etc. during grade school. Climate may be changing now, but it is difficult to sort out what are temporary trends or changes in weather vs true climate change. It's even harder to pin any changes in climate on human activities - particularly when using computer modeling of processes we don't fully understand.
The left’s stance on this is based on ideology and partisanship, not science.