Posted on 11/25/2018 12:11:29 PM PST by Olog-hai
Bond is supposed to be a lady’s man. Not gay or female.
Yes.
Because people like you don’t engage in fighting “silly” culture war topics.
I’m not a Bond fan, would never read the stories or buy a movie ticket but a black, British Bond would be fine with me. He must be a Man, must be British and must like his women (and not to borrow their clothes).
Gay, huh. No wonder I couldn't watch after the first few seconds. The new guy is all wrong for the part.
Thank goodness for the wisdom and goodwill of non-Whites.
And we repayed them by taking all their stuff and enslaving them./sarc
So, altering the ethnic/racial identity of an established literary character is perfectly legitimate - even one based upon a composite of actual persons?
How about a white Othello?
/sarcoff
What’s wrong with James Bond being white?
What’s wrong with Alexander Hamilton being white?
We seem to be living in an alternate universe.
.
.
Never watched or liked James Bond but if they want a Brown Bond the perfect guy is Shemar Moore.Gorgeous and he has “it” IMO .
“That’s where I spend my time, not on some great black actor playing bond.”
So on those threads you points what, 125 responses, instead of just 25 like on this one?
See their posts 91 and 120 for some lovely cognitive disjunction.
They won’t fight irrelevant culture issues, but whine about the direct outgrowth of same.
“You underestimate the power movies have to shape culture.”
The “it's only a movie” line always irritated me. That being said, I can understand that one might think other issues have more importance. Though I'd like to think we can walk and cheer bubble gum at the same time. And I might be able to enjoy a good Bond move with Elba playing the lead. I'll just know I'm not watching a realistic portrayal of James Bond any more than I would watching a white actor playing MLK.
The reason, I believe, for your objection is not that Elba would be chosen because he's a good actor, but because of his skin color. Diversity for diversity's sake, while still decrying “whitewashing.” And that's not a good thing.
Saw that and agreed, spot on x100.
The attempt to play the race card by that other poster in 118 was quite telling when coupled with their 91 and 120.
Anyone else get the same feeling about those?
Don’t know why that would be so difficult. There are plenty of black people scattered throughout the British Isles, so the character can be that.
I dont care what color he is, but _HE_ has to be British, and straight.
The people polled for “yes” on SJW destruction of such film franchises are not the AUDIENCE for James Bond flicks.
You’re right. Movies are never “just movies”, we have to face facts that the average American’s worldview is shaped by television and movies. People’s views on history, law, culture, morality, all of this is based off of what they see on TV.
We may want to snicker and decry the state of society, but that’s the paradigm we live in. Working on campaigns and obsessing over elections only goes so far. If you don’t believe me look at how the Gay Rights Movement succeeded. Prop 8 may have been voted in, but propaganda pushed through television like Will & Grace brainwashed the judicial system enough to strike it down. If you don’t like where the transgender agenda is going, we have to confront the fact that Hollywood has already begun indoctrinating people about it.
Winning an election in 2 years is pointless if in 20 years everyone is convinced your ideals are evil. We have ceded control over the culture and we have lost badly for decades because of it. We need to acknowledge this and reclaim it. Elections are not separate from this, and politics is not divorced from culture. In fact culture dictates politics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.