Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

I guess I’m dating myself here but I just can’t get used to a London that even has much of a skyline to speak of. In my time there back in the early 90’s what few buildings could be considered skyscrapers were sort of peripheral, akin to the areas out in La Défense, the area around Paris.


12 posted on 11/19/2018 6:53:09 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Just say “No!” London needs this like a hole in the head.


16 posted on 11/19/2018 7:12:18 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
I guess I’m dating myself here but I just can’t get used to a London that even has much of a skyline to speak of. In my time there back in the early 90’s what few buildings could be considered skyscrapers were sort of peripheral, akin to the areas out in La Défense, the area around Paris.

That's a bit how I feel about Philadelphia. For 100 years there was a law that no building could be taller than the statue of William Penn on top of the 19th century City hall in Philly. The skyline, as a result, was that statue sticking up over everything. Then in the early 90s they bent the rule for a single skyscraper because it was sort of over there, where you didn't see it if from the main thorofares. But once the rule is bent once, well, there are plenty of skyscrapers now. Not like Manhattan or London (now) but it's still jarring to see an entire city look different than it was when I was a kid.

19 posted on 11/19/2018 7:43:26 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson