Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel
but you have no problem with nearly naked women pushed in all media but women actually feeding their babies is somehow so terrible?...

why would you want your babies to not be fed when their hungry, or make them go out to the cold car with their moms or just use the dirty germy restroom

I think its guilt....female breasts are, always have been, and always will be biologically for one reason only....to feed their babies..and that is not what men want to hear or acknowledge because its all about them apparently, not the children...

48 posted on 11/18/2018 10:02:06 AM PST by cherry (official troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: cherry
Look...this is about women who want the world to dance around their poor control of scheduling their time. There's absolutely no reason to feed a child in public...none....unless you're looking for attention.

I'm a women and see nothing all that special about breast feeding except between the baby and mother. It should not be something ‘flaunted’ in public. Woman know their baby's feeding schedule and can plan their activities around that.....

55 posted on 11/18/2018 10:09:39 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

Let’s look at human history

Savages walk around with boobs bouncing or flapping in tropical environs

As you go up the civilizational ladder men and women are more modest

Except of course as you point out we are oversexualized

For a very long time women have used a nursing blanket etc to breastfeed in public

A very long time

Were all those women victims of horny male patriarchy

Most women I’ve known don’t want to be watched whilst breastfeeding and have some modesty in life in general

I’m no Puritan

I like little bikinis even thongs at the right discreet beach without our teen boys with us

Cleavage great

Legs...and dainty ankles....thank you lord

But I don’t think it’s appropriate to publicly breastfeed with the boob fully exposed

Nor is the boob I can assure simply a biological function organ

Maybe for some girls

But when girls are younger before babies the boobs don’t lie.....

After breastfeeding sensitivity does decrease and I’m sorry for that

On a conservative forum ....what an unusual stance you’ve taken

But feel free this is not an attack

In Louisville the law is in your side

I just don’t think most women agree

I could be wrong what do I know...I’m only a man..lol

I’ve never met a boob under 40 that wasn’t erogenous....for the record


57 posted on 11/18/2018 10:14:30 AM PST by wardaddy (I don’t care that you’re not a racist......when the shooting starts it won’t matter what yo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

And I think that instead of pushing your point about breasts being just to feed babies and normal and natural you think about the reality that you are making other people uncomfortable and be courteous. Just because you think people are wrong doesn’t change how they see the situation.

And I nursed my 4 children over a 14 year span in public without offending anyone or smothering a child.


58 posted on 11/18/2018 10:15:04 AM PST by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

I breast fed in public with a blanket to cover my breast. Why is that so hard?


60 posted on 11/18/2018 10:21:51 AM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

Yes, you are trolling.


91 posted on 11/18/2018 12:39:21 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know. how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

Give me break, in our modern civilized society there are things called breast pumps and bottles and refrigerators that allow a mother to feed her baby healthy breast milk in public while being respectful of the sensibilities of others.


94 posted on 11/18/2018 12:46:27 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

Yeah, we know, male sexuality disgusts you.


113 posted on 11/18/2018 1:07:44 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry

I know this will be hard for you to digest, given some of our past (ahem) “disagreements” vis a vis “women’s behaviors,” but I fully advocate what I refer to as “the mommy exemption.” That is, when it comes to a woman breastfeeding her child...MIND YOUR OWN FRIGGIN BUSINESS!


136 posted on 11/18/2018 2:07:16 PM PST by papertyger (Trump, A president so great, that Democrats who said they would leave America if he won, stayed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry
"...but you have no problem with nearly naked women pushed in all media but women actually feeding their babies is somehow so terrible..."

cherry, where did I say I have no problem with naked women being pushed in the media, and I never said women feeding their babies is terrible? I didn't say or imply either of those things.

If you read my posts and are rational about it, you should see that I do not subscribe to either of those things.

This is an emotionally charged subject for people, let's discuss it without putting words into the mouths of others.

The reality is women's breasts mean more to men than a bulge in the chest, and God made them have that effect on men too.

God gave men a sex drive for a purpose. It isn't always rational, but it is there. That said, it is pretty clear that breasts do not exist for one single purpose only, the feeding of children. They also factor into the sexual attractiveness of women to men.

And this isn't simply a reflection of the modern world where you are correct, we are bathed in it. It is an established fact that men have always viewed women's breasts as more than just a container for mother's milk. That is irrefutable and not even open to debate. If you look throughout history, cultures even centuries before the advent of the Roman Empire understood that breasts were attractive to men.

Certainly, there are cultures where women don't have to conceal their breasts, but those cultures are at usually more primitive. And even in those cultures, it is undeniable that the breasts are sexually attractive to the opposite sex.

It is the way God made us, or did after we were forced to leave the Garden of Eden.

144 posted on 11/18/2018 2:21:29 PM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: cherry
I think its guilt....female breasts are, always have been, and always will be biologically for one reason only....to feed their babies..and that is not what men want to hear or acknowledge because its all about them apparently, not the children...

Somehow, I think that if women explained that before marriage (along with your accompanying attitude) I think there would be significantly fewer marriages.

157 posted on 11/18/2018 2:48:41 PM PST by gogeo (The Repubs may not always deserve to win, but the RATs always deserve to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson