cherry, where did I say I have no problem with naked women being pushed in the media, and I never said women feeding their babies is terrible? I didn't say or imply either of those things.
If you read my posts and are rational about it, you should see that I do not subscribe to either of those things.
This is an emotionally charged subject for people, let's discuss it without putting words into the mouths of others.
The reality is women's breasts mean more to men than a bulge in the chest, and God made them have that effect on men too.
God gave men a sex drive for a purpose. It isn't always rational, but it is there. That said, it is pretty clear that breasts do not exist for one single purpose only, the feeding of children. They also factor into the sexual attractiveness of women to men.
And this isn't simply a reflection of the modern world where you are correct, we are bathed in it. It is an established fact that men have always viewed women's breasts as more than just a container for mother's milk. That is irrefutable and not even open to debate. If you look throughout history, cultures even centuries before the advent of the Roman Empire understood that breasts were attractive to men.
Certainly, there are cultures where women don't have to conceal their breasts, but those cultures are at usually more primitive. And even in those cultures, it is undeniable that the breasts are sexually attractive to the opposite sex.
It is the way God made us, or did after we were forced to leave the Garden of Eden.
It seems lost on many here but most women I’ve known were aroused through their breasts
Second only to the man in the boat sensitivity wise though nipple sensitivity fades some after multiple child births
Breasts have to be caressed not just ogled at or milked
One man’s opinion
I have witnessed a woman O simply through breast stimulation in my long years
This notion by some here....not you....that breasts are just humanoid udders is weird
Does this make me parochial..lol