Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueMondaySkipper; Okeydoker
I came to this thread the day before the midterms thinking that perhaps someone who has been following this Q would be able to explain to me why the unredacted FBI FISA documents had not been released as I perceived they had been promised. This October Boom, if you will. I was rightfully concerned that the dems were getting a free pass before the mid-terms and that it might cost the republicans the house. I received one snarky comment after another and accused of being a troll by this group. You all do not come across very well when someone who might be a skeptic of all things Q attempts to engage a topic. The responses I have received have not endeared me to your cause and I for one would not want your type being able to disrupt our normal threads on FR. I had no opinion on this prior to my own recent interactions. This group seems incapable of rational debate and hurls insults at warp speed to anyone who shows up who doesn't drink the koolaid. I was not aware that the Q stuff had been isolated to one thread but now I can understand why it was done. Some of you come across at nuts.
436 posted on 11/14/2018 6:30:59 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Sham

440 posted on 11/14/2018 6:33:38 PM PST by haffast (SUPERPOWER STATUS: ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Sham; Okeydoker

. . . The responses I have received have not endeared me to your cause and I for one would not want your type being able to disrupt our normal threads on FR....

. . . Some of you come across at nuts.


LOL! Do you know who you posted to?

Uncle Sham, meet Okeydoker, Okeydoker meet Uncle Sham.


446 posted on 11/14/2018 6:43:55 PM PST by KittenClaws ("They've got Daryl's Dad's car! .....Red Dawn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Sham
I had no opinion on this prior to my own recent interactions.

So now you've formed your opinion. And really, did you think this pablum post would wipe away your previous nastiness?

Nastiness noted. Now go away.

471 posted on 11/14/2018 7:32:09 PM PST by blu (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Sham

Poor little innocent you just came to get some love and understanding (sniff, sniff) and everyone was just so mean to you.

Is that why your very first comment on the Q thread was REMOVED BY THE MODERATOR? So unfortunately we don’t know what it was but judging by your combativeness ever since, I think your little sob story is A BUNCH OF BS AND DEBUNKED.


608 posted on 11/15/2018 1:59:10 AM PST by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Sham
I came to this thread the day before the midterms thinking that perhaps someone who has been following this Q would be able to explain to me why the unredacted FBI FISA documents had not been released as I perceived they had been promised.

DICTIONARY: "Loser"
noun
1. a person, team, nation, etc., that loses: The visiting team was the loser in the series.
2. a person or thing that seems destined to be taken advantage of, fail, etc a born loser

DICTIONARY: "Pathetic Loser"
noun
1. a loser who is such a loser, that other losers look down on you
2. an interwebz troll

628 posted on 11/15/2018 5:36:13 AM PST by USMC79to83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Sham

I thought this was a helpful answer:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3702930/posts?page=386#386

You can’t honestly say that this “group seems incapable of rational debate” when you refuse to engage in rational debate.


754 posted on 11/15/2018 12:28:23 PM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson