Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: generally
What if there is something to it? Not the trollish part, but consider that perhaps Quidam could really have been an insider but was someone who did not have enough info or enough power.

I remember Quidam.

Here's my Quidam theory.

Quidam never presented as an inside source like Q does. Some say he was Matt Drudge or some other Drudge-like person. If so, that's not an "insider" per se. That would be somebody who has INSIDER INFORMATION. In other words, a Woodward and Bernstein-like figure. One with "inside sources".

Somebody comparable today to a LS, Jerome 'Fatbody' Corsi, Sara Carter, or a John Soloman.

Of course there are people that have "inside sources". Always have been, always will be.

The huge difference between Qanon and Quidam and those others is that Q professes, and has been proven to be, THE insider. Not somebody the insider is communicating through.

And this is the mistake those who compare Q to Quidam make. It's apples and oranges.

And on the subject of Quidam. I think the only "proof" that those who call Quidam a hoax or a Larp have is that Clinton didn't get removed from office, like Quidam led us to believe he would.

We have seen four ourselves that people who are reported (by Q) to have been "turned" sometimes change their minds for various reasons. People don't always behave predictably. Quidam, or Q, can know of a deal made that gets broken. These are simply realities. It's good that we understand those things.

To dismiss Quidam out of hand as a hoax or a Larp is to not understand reality and all the possibilities that exist. It's really an "expand your thinking" thing.

Not only do I believe Q is legit, but I also believe this hard truth. That there is a possibility that Trump and his team (which includes Q and other patriots) could fail in this valiant and brave attempt to rescue America and the world.

Like I said in another post, the Derp State is vast, international, wealthy beyond understanding, and willing to do things we are not.

We can still lose. And that's what I think we did during the Clinton years. We lost. Those (perhaps) supplying Quidam with his information, lost.

And from there, our very own negative nelly FReepers were broken, never again to take a chance and maybe to lose hope forever. I've seen this attitude over and over and over again on the threads over the past year, with regards to Q. People get old. People get tired.

It has been my personal hope to reignite their fighting spirit, as mine has been. We can't give up on our true brothers and sisters, and they are many, despite their attacks on us.

We will need all our soldiers in the wars to come.

So, was Quidam a hoax? Maybe. And maybe not. Maybe he just lost.

People need to think about that.

Bagster


331 posted on 11/14/2018 3:03:02 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

Well said, bagster.


361 posted on 11/14/2018 3:42:26 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

To: bagster
Trident/Delta was a long time FReeper who last posted in 2006. I don't know if he's still alive.

When the whole quidam thing died down, Trident took a train from Connecticut to DC to have lunch with quidam. All he would say afterward was that quidam was real, he worked for Ken Starr, and he was bitterly disappointed to find that Starr had been compromised.

That's about all I can remember after two decades.

364 posted on 11/14/2018 3:47:51 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

To: bagster; generally

.
Quidam was the wife of some kind of police officer.


381 posted on 11/14/2018 4:07:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

“So, was Quidam a hoax? Maybe. And maybe not. Maybe he just lost.”


VERY nice post, Bagster... or should I call you Samwise?


535 posted on 11/14/2018 9:03:38 PM PST by Melian (Patriots fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

Great post.


583 posted on 11/14/2018 10:45:56 PM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

To: Bigg Red

Mark


885 posted on 11/15/2018 7:47:24 PM PST by Bigg Red (The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson