There are some dim bulbs here that seem to think Q is posting in person here or something.
There has been a lot of discussion (mostly by trolls) trying to link Q to Quidam.
Disclosure: I have no memory of Quidam and no stake in either defending him or vilifying him.
What if there is something to it? Not the trollish part, but consider that perhaps Quidam could really have been an insider but was someone who did not have enough info or enough power.
Many believe that the way Trump has identified leakers was to tell something to only the leaker and then see if it leaked to the outside. Perhaps false info was given to Quidam so that he could be ID’d and removed by the DS.
Consider also that Quidam could have been a test run for Q. What if the entire Q operation has been YEARS, even decades, in the planning? It would not surprise me. It makes much more sense than to think such an elaborate plan was cobbled together in less than a year after Trump was sworn in. What if Quidam was an exploration of comms by the Q team? Maybe they learned what worked and what didn’t. Maybe they learned how much influence they would have on FR. (Maybe that’s why Q did NOT choose FR as a primary comms platform.)
Most major ops have dry runs. Why not Q?
Examples: Many people are calling the election fraud this year a dry run for the Ds to learn techniques for stealing the election in 2020. Many people think there have been dry runs of DEW weapons as a prelude to using them to start the CA fires. Or that the CA fires are a dry run for future use of such weapons.
Yeah. And some here that seem to fail to think much at all; and some who seem to be very poorly informed in spite of tons of good information hereon.