Q Anon: 11/13/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 11/13/18 | FReepers, vanity

[Bigg Red]

Whoa!

[stylin19a]

California and Maryland are the only states that place restrictions on flame throwers.
The Feds don’t ban, they left it up to the state.

[JockoManning]

Some Freepers were rude to Quidam and he stopped posting just about the time Drudge removed the FR link on his home page.

Makes sense to me. Too often, too many FREEPERS have been like typical Christians--eating our own too quickly, too eagerly, over too little.

[JockoManning]

Some Freepers were rude to Quidam and he stopped posting just about the time Drudge removed the FR link on his home page.

Makes sense to me. Too often, too many FREEPERS have been like typical Christians--eating our own too quickly, too eagerly, over too little.

[irish guard]

With respect. You weren’t here back then. He made all sorts of representations that Ken Starr has bad things about Clinton. Even when the spinach dip was found on the blue dress, he still claimed Starr had serious offenses that the Dems could not refute.

[JockoManning]

Electrify it to the level needed for a big longhorn bull?

[KittenClaws]

"Q is getting pretty close to pulling a “Quidam” on this board-which some of us who’ve been here since the Clinton Impeachment will clearly recall how we were played then."

Ah yes, how well some of us remember "Quidham". Makes one wonder if he just shortened his name doesn't it?

—- I wasn't’t here (or wasn’t paying attention)when Quidham was active, but I can almost understand that, having been humiliated by him one could be overly vicious to another with a familiar name.

I recall a Three Stooges episode where a woman slapped Larry across the face and declared “how dare you remind me of someone I hate!”

I wonder, was quidham as well vetted and researched as Q has been on thi thread? As for me, if Q turns out to be fake...it makes no difference as we have done our due diligence and my self esteem will not be harmed.

[JockoManning]

I’m not convinced Quidam was fake—just that his predictions didn’t meat the criteria of some . . . and he may have reached beyond the length of his arms or contacts.

[MileHi]

Actually I’ve been on FR 15 years, not that that has anything to do with the subject.

So you're a banned retread. Makes sense. So you know, I don't look to a majority consensus to decide what I think, deocRats and communists do that, pinko.

[irish guard]

You asked “Then why bring it up?”

I responded because you asked this on post #204....<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>

so I posted what Quidam was about back then. I left no impression he had anything to do with Q. And for some reason you seem to think I randomly raised the matter.

[bagster]

What if there is something to it? Not the trollish part, but consider that perhaps Quidam could really have been an insider but was someone who did not have enough info or enough power.

I remember Quidam.

Here's my Quidam theory.

Quidam never presented as an inside source like Q does. Some say he was Matt Drudge or some other Drudge-like person. If so, that's not an "insider" per se. That would be somebody who has INSIDER INFORMATION. In other words, a Woodward and Bernstein-like figure. One with "inside sources".

Somebody comparable today to a LS, Jerome 'Fatbody' Corsi, Sara Carter, or a John Soloman.

Of course there are people that have "inside sources". Always have been, always will be.

The huge difference between Qanon and Quidam and those others is that Q professes, and has been proven to be, THE insider. Not somebody the insider is communicating through.

And this is the mistake those who compare Q to Quidam make. It's apples and oranges.

And on the subject of Quidam. I think the only "proof" that those who call Quidam a hoax or a Larp have is that Clinton didn't get removed from office, like Quidam led us to believe he would.

We have seen four ourselves that people who are reported (by Q) to have been "turned" sometimes change their minds for various reasons. People don't always behave predictably. Quidam, or Q, can know of a deal made that gets broken. These are simply realities. It's good that we understand those things.

To dismiss Quidam out of hand as a hoax or a Larp is to not understand reality and all the possibilities that exist. It's really an "expand your thinking" thing.

Not only do I believe Q is legit, but I also believe this hard truth. That there is a possibility that Trump and his team (which includes Q and other patriots) could fail in this valiant and brave attempt to rescue America and the world.

Like I said in another post, the Derp State is vast, international, wealthy beyond understanding, and willing to do things we are not.

We can still lose. And that's what I think we did during the Clinton years. We lost. Those (perhaps) supplying Quidam with his information, lost.

And from there, our very own negative nelly FReepers were broken, never again to take a chance and maybe to lose hope forever. I've seen this attitude over and over and over again on the threads over the past year, with regards to Q. People get old. People get tired.

It has been my personal hope to reignite their fighting spirit, as mine has been. We can't give up on our true brothers and sisters, and they are many, despite their attacks on us.

We will need all our soldiers in the wars to come.

So, was Quidam a hoax? Maybe. And maybe not. Maybe he just lost.

People need to think about that.

Bagster

[JockoManning]

There are some dim bulbs here that seem to think Q is posting in person here or something.\

Yeah. And some here that seem to fail to think much at all; and some who seem to be very poorly informed in spite of tons of good information hereon.

[Bigg Red]

::BEST PRESIDENT IN MY LIFETIME!::

......

Ditto

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “Some Freepers were rude to Quidam and he stopped posting...” <<

Quidam was a woman! .

[irish guard]

Sorry...this was omitted from the last post. >>>>>>I’m not familiar with this “Quidam” thing. Did it have a global following? Or just confined to FR? Did it want Freepers to pay it money? What exactly was the problem?<<<<<<

from #204

[bagster]

With respect. You weren’t here back then.

With respect, I kinda was.

Didn't post, though. Still, I was there.

Bagster

[irish guard]

So I responded to who Quidam was and made no reference to anything else

[MomwithHope]

.

[irish guard]

Ok, but if you’re asking about the guy, I followed him like a fool

[JockoManning]

I like Mark Taylor, too. He’s a bit wound up at times but these are issues worth being wound up about. I do NOT like most of the male interviewers because they talk more of the time and don’t allow Mark to talk much when Mark’s the reason we click on the channel to begin with. Some of those male interviewer channels I no longer click on.