Posted on 11/13/2018 10:04:47 PM PST by ransomnote
.
thanks for the ping!
Just be glad that FR has given you at least ONE thread to discuss your stuff. Most social media sites just jettison the whole topic.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’m sure you have subsequently thought of this, but if Q is a Larp, and those who believe are deluding themselves, why would any board, website, or social media care if they wallow in their delusion? No, to be fact that they have to censor Q, and to squash the movement, and paint it as a delusion actually PROVES that there is something there they fear.
Surely you can understand that, being one of the major trolls trying to cast aspersions.
I’ve never heard either one of those but I do like listening to Mark Taylor.
Braaahaaaahaaaahaaaaaa.......thanks for that!
Heeeheeeheeeeeee........heeheehee...
Friend, sites aren’t quarantining or banning Q threads because they are afraid of q or whatever. They re doing so for the same reason that fR does, namely they don’t want to be identified in the public eye as a Q site.
Sites dependent on growth, donations or advertising can’t afford to be identified as q conspircy site. This is quite elementary.
:: Sites dependent on growth, donations or advertising can’t afford to be identified as q conspircy site. ::
Now, why is that, I wonder?
#PalpableFear
Ya, big goings on in Israel/Gaza as we speak.
Missiles are flying.
Bagster
Was Quidam a hoax because Clinton didn't get removed from office? Or is there some other proof that he was a hoax?
Think about it. I'm actually curious what your answer will be.
#NotMessingWithYou
Bagster
Edzo4 back after being banned from FR huh?
Could we please just ignore the trolls? It’s really cluttering things up and all it’s doing is encouraging them.
-SB
So tell us based on your extensive experience doing criminal investigations how long it takes to investigate and prosecute.
Thumbs up on Derek Prince. IIRC, at the time he was the youngest person ever appointed a Fellow (~”professor” for Americans) in the Philosophy Dept. in King’s College, Cambridge...as he used to remark, “I am qualified to teach Greek at the University level,” and a fascinating conversion story.
So in your expert opinion it would be a better marketing strategy for a conservative “discussion forum” to be identified as Anti-First Amendment by banning discussion of certain subjects? Do you think the owner will put you on the board that gets to pick the subjects ALLOWED for discussion?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.