Could it be due to really embarrassing Geekbench 4 score results?
Yup, could be. It’s 9.4% as fast as the iPad Pro (2018). . . and about 25% the speed of a standard iPad (2017). ROTFLMAO!
That’s the tablet fireman15 has.
That’s the tablet fireman15 has.
You guys crack me up. I have other more pricey tablets, but the two 8” Fire HDs cost $49 on sale, have great battery life, work fine for looking at websites, checking emails, reading books and magazines, watching video, and playing games. Often it is nice to have something along that didn’t cost an arm and a leg. So they actually get used a lot.
I understand wanting a powerful device for content creation, or certain types of highly realistic computer games or simulations. When I am working on a complex model to print on our 3-D printer, editing high definition video of one of my wife's historical presentations, or even doing work in photoshop... I appreciate quick processing times. But 99% of the people that I know who spend a lot of money on incredibly expensive electronic devices don't actually use them for content creation or even demanding gaming apps.
I assume these people are victims of marketing hype of the type that you like to post that is along the same line as the hype that convinces people to buy an expensive new car. I own two airplanes and two large houses but would never consider purchasing even a moderately priced new car. They are a complete waste of money. I might buy a 3 year old luxury car that has already depreciated 50% but the newest vehicle we currently own is 10 years old. So why do people who are not content creators or addicted to highly realistic video games buy super expensive devices that after 3 years are not much quicker than cheap current devices, and then ridicule others who don't do the same. But who are the actual fools?