For someone so knowledgeable you seem extremely dense. I thought that it was an act, but now I am not so sure.
I copied and pasted (never tested) from the first table that shows up in the Laptop Mag “review” linked in the article you posted. It demonstrated that of the three devices did not all receive the same tests, not they were not tested at all. This indicated that this was not an actual comparison review. The “reviewers” did not even bother to get all three devices for a side by side comparison. They relied on “reviews” from third parties.
I fully expect you to twist my words, mischaracterize, or just out and out lie again about what I wrote because this is a theme in your modus operandi. But of course it doesn’t make a bit of difference. This entire discussion was just a distraction from the important events that took place yesterday. If you are unable to recognize the insignificance of this thread then you really do need to add some carbs to your diet because you are not firing on all cylinders.
All three of those devices, the iPad Pro, the Dell XPS 13 9370. and the Samsung Galaxy Book 2 have undergone Geekbench 4 testing. . . whether or not YOU can find the relevant testing for each device or not.
I linked you to the charts showing you those results. Geekbench is a standard test designed for comparisons across platforms and does NOT require repetitive, side-by-side testing each time a reviewer writes a review of another device. THEY DO NOT CHANGE BETWEEN TESTS OR REVIEWS! They are considered reliable across tests, reviews, and reporters, especially with such organizations with reputations such as Tom's Guide and Laptop Magazine.
You are the thread troll here, fireman15, making a mountain out of some insignificant molehill that you've concocted in your own mind, creating a need for reviewers to duplicate and replicate again already existing tests of every device they compare or mention in the review of a new item. That is why you are delusional.