Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
Look back over the last 40 years in the NFL and notice: (1) how many championship teams had a good running game without a stud running back, and (2) the number of Hall of Fame runners who did nothing to help their team become a championship contender.

Barry Sanders is a perfect example, and Barkley has looked a lot like him through his first few games. Sanders could run for 150 yards on 20 carries in a game, but when you looked closely at his games you'll see that he was very ineffective despite all those yards. In his typical 150-yard game he'd have two long runs of 60 yards each, then just 30 yards on his other 18 carries. That's an awful recipe for an offense in the NFL, because the team can't run a ball-possession offense and usually faces situations of 2nd-and-9, 3rd-and-7+, etc.

54 posted on 10/30/2018 12:15:49 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians willm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

It’s true. Philadelphia was very much “Running Back by Commitee” last year. Ajayi was the flashy runner. He’s hurt this year. But they very much miss the tough yardage Blount got them last year.


61 posted on 10/30/2018 2:49:12 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Detroit was very much 1-dimensional. Sanders faced 9, 10 men in the box often. That will make you the kind of runner you aptly described. Had they any kind of passing attack, Barry would have been more effective.


62 posted on 10/30/2018 2:53:10 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson