Skip to comments.
From Trolling To Fleecing: Co-Creator Of ‘Q’ Hoax Explains Its Scary Evolution
The Federalist ^
| October 29, 2018
| Georgi Boorman
Posted on 10/29/2018 8:37:17 AM PDT by detective
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-180 next last
To: detective
Remember when Podesta was supposed to be arrested? Q promised that back in November. Still waiting for that one....
21
posted on
10/29/2018 9:02:42 AM PDT
by
NELSON111
(Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
To: Red Badger
22
posted on
10/29/2018 9:05:48 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: proust
"I love Q, it’s the ultimate i-Q test. I know who to disregard quickly. These people are stupid!"Likewise those that follow Q are keeping track of those who don't just doubt, but mock followers of Q. One day the truth will come out. It has not with Microchip.
23
posted on
10/29/2018 9:08:40 AM PDT
by
SW6906
(6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
To: SW6906
lol non-believers shall be smited!
24
posted on
10/29/2018 9:10:59 AM PDT
by
proust
("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
To: detective
25
posted on
10/29/2018 9:11:03 AM PDT
by
Hostage
(Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))
To: Yo-Yo
Thank you.....................
26
posted on
10/29/2018 9:12:04 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(I lie to pollsters......................ALL Of THEM!...................)
To: UCANSEE2
Is the information valuable, regardless to whether there is actually a “Q” or not ?
____________________________________________________
THAT is the $64,000 question. And the answer is NO.
There has been nothing of any substance that these Q posts have resulted in. In fact - they are wrong on most “predictions”. Lucky guesses on the rest.
To: Responsibility2nd
Bingo.
Tantalizing as Q posts are, nothing of value came of them.
28
posted on
10/29/2018 9:16:05 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
To: detective
Q always reminded me of the “Birth Cert” discussions.
The common thread was “Once this all gets out, it will be the end of (name your poison)”
We eventually found the the Birth Cert think came from the Clinton Machine.
The only thing which is going to change politics in the USA is sending 30-50 people to prison for 20 years from both parties.
VJ, Holder and IRS head under Obama need to be the first three.
Add Zukerburg, Bezos and a few reporters from CNN and NBC for good measure.
“Obstruction of Justice, use of gov organizations for political gain, RICO”
29
posted on
10/29/2018 9:20:37 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: Stosh
But since Q has taken up with Classy Green Eyed Blonde the Hurtgen Forest will never be the same.
30
posted on
10/29/2018 9:20:50 AM PDT
by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: ctdonath2
I’ve said this before.
QAnon is just this years version of Pizza Gate. I do admit that I followed that conspiracy theory a little more than I should. But I soon realized that even if it were 100 percent completely true - so what?
Would it result in anything? Anything at all?
Nope and nope.
Same thing with Q. Chasing the wind in a silly exercise of futility.
To: ctdonath2; Responsibility2nd; Wuli; Stosh; bert; Fightin Whitey; proust
32
posted on
10/29/2018 9:27:27 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: UCANSEE2
Even if the people behind it had inside information, it’s too vague to be useful.
33
posted on
10/29/2018 9:27:50 AM PDT
by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: detective
What are your thoughts on the article? Probesick proved nothing and made himself look like a fool. This article is completely wrong on many levels.
To: Responsibility2nd
But I soon realized that even if it were 100 percent completely true - so what? You're serious?
35
posted on
10/29/2018 9:28:34 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: BinaryBoy
Even if the people behind it had inside information, it’s too vague to be useful. Is it?
Is it really?
36
posted on
10/29/2018 9:29:34 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: detective
Some Freepers follow "Q". Non-bogus.
What are your thoughts on the article?
Bogus.
37
posted on
10/29/2018 9:36:22 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: UCANSEE2
Is the information valuable, Yes.
38
posted on
10/29/2018 9:37:05 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: AU72
Among other things doxing the creators of WeThePeople soapbox is despicable. Ayuh.
39
posted on
10/29/2018 9:37:46 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Delta 21
I like One America News. #MeToo
40
posted on
10/29/2018 9:38:26 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-180 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
