That drop was Q-2376
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.369 📁 Oct 8 2018 22:58:37 (EST) [Sally Yates] Q
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anyone have any idea why Q would let this drop prematurely?
I made the mistake of telling some blue-pill people to watch what would be happening to Sally Yates if they wanted to see Q in action ... then crickets.
I'm convinced that Q mentions things that don't necessarily get immediately reported anywhere.
That's been proven true many times, IMHO (ha)
p.s. A REAL investigative journalist could find out if she "lawyered up", but those are a very rare breed these days. Sara Carter has her hands full.
Bagster
Anyone have any idea why Q would let this drop prematurely?
I made the mistake of telling some blue-pill people to watch what would be happening to Sally Yates if they wanted to see Q in action ... then crickets.
_______________________________________________
FWIW, the Anons titled the Qdrop on Qmap.pub “Sally Yates Targeted”. She may have been or is now targeted and we probably wouldn’t know about it. I think some of these are negotiation points - opportunities to plea bargain or offer to provide evidence voluntarily before it gets “serious.”
I checked her Twitter feed and she had been silent for a few weeks and then on Oct. 16 posted something negative about President Trump using celebrities as photo ops (Kanye West). I think that, given Wikipedia says her legal name is Sally Caroline Yates, its a little surprising that her Twitter handle is @SallyQYates.
When I searched for “Sally Yates” on the web, nothing recent comes up, not even that Tweet from Oct. 16.
Again, we see the brackets used to indicate “boxed in”?
SY has ^insider^ info on the FISA debacle that incriminates her or someone very close to her; someone she is beholden too or by whom she is “owned”.
It takes time to convince her to spill the beans but, at some point, POTUS “might have to get involved”. Ne c’est pas?
Chaff (no time for graphic, gotta mop the floor)