“. . . encouraged & enhanced each other’s craziness.”
“We should also notice here that in concurring with Crazy Roger . . .”
“. . . concurred in Crazy Roger's insanity.”
“So any notion that Chief Justice Taney (encouraged by President Buchanan) was anything other than stark raving insane . . .”
". . . show the world how crazy you & Roger both are/were.”
". . . not what you or Crazy Roger suppose they might have meant.”
". . . the kinds of opinions Crazy Roger enshrined in Dred Scott.”
"That makes Crazy Roger's claims otherwise, by definition, pure insanity . . .”
". . . until Crazy Roger legislated those things from the Supreme Court's bench.”
“Crazy Roger's excuse is simple insanity.”
“All seven justices voting for Crazy Roger's Dred Scott ruling were . . .”
“So when Crazy Roger Taney ruled that Congress had no authority . . .”
". . . an authority which Crazy Roger Taney singlehandedly abolished . . .”
“. . . Cracy Roger's ruling P.O.’d a lot of Northerners . . .”
". . . Crazy Roger's “logic” was complete nonsense . . .”
“. . .which sounds like the “logic” of Crazy Rober’s Dred Scott ruling.”
“. . . notion come from that Crazy Roger was anything other than stark raving mad??”
In the last eight hours a disturbing condition has manifested. Eight hours.
It seems that jeffersondem believes both Crazy Roger and Doughfaced Buchanan were perfectly rational human beings.
I disagree.