The Earth has had vastly higher levels of CO2 during the course of various geologic eras.
This is a good graph to show to people who are obsessed about the last 100 years.
Posted on 10/19/2018 11:09:14 AM PDT by Red Badger
The Earth has had vastly higher levels of CO2 during the course of various geologic eras.
This is a good graph to show to people who are obsessed about the last 100 years.
Global warming people are a bunch of CNTs.
CO2 levels are now at 415... so highest in 400,000 years, per both your chart and mine.
More commonly used for health purposes, lithium carbonate is often used in tandem with treatment of mental health disorders.
The author needs to go back and take 7th grade science again. This process does NOT remove CO2 from the air, it removes if from lithium carbonate. The amount of CO2 in the air stays exactly the same. In addition, the energy to liberate the carbon requires more burning of fossil fuels than is “captured”. Why not simply use the carbon in coal? Besides all that, the mass of useful nanotubes is trivial compared with the mass of CO2 the Global Warming religious zealots want removed.
I made it to here....
I haven’t cranked the numbers, but I strongly suspect any CO2 -—to-—> carbon nanotubes reaction is going to be exergonic - it’s going to be a process that’s uphill in energy.
And if I’m right and you’ve got to put a pile of energy into the process to get it to go, I doubt you’re going to get that energy from sunshine or your friendly neighborhood windmill - not if you have to work with a molten salt at a temperature of over 700 degrees.
Why are they constantly pounding this “carbon dioxide is poison” schtick?
___________________________________________________
Same reason they keep pounding the communism work! we just ain’t done it right yet! schtick.
They’re evil and idiots.
How about feeding it to plants? You know, air for plants? Going green? Save the Planet type stuff.
Mankind puts out 1010 tons of CO2 per year.
How many devices that weigh 10-10 tons would have to be made every year to put a dent in CO2 output?
Maybe if every human being on the planet needed ten million of them every year.
These authors are just INCREDIBLY STUPID. How they get hired as "science" writers is beyond me.
We were in the Cabinet Mountains in Western Montana last week where, 14,000 years ago, the area was under 3,500 feet of ice. And that was at the very southern leading edge of the huge ice sheets that covered much of North America. That was not very long ago when you think about it.
“mass of useful nanotubes is trivial compared with the mass of CO2 the Global Warming religious zealots want removed.”
I made the same comment before reading yours. See #34.
Propaganda.
“The main cause of global warming is CO2.” Just plain false on many fronts.
Assuming you buy many of their assumptions, water vapor has about 100 time the concentration as co2. (Ps - this is rarely mentioned because mankind does not impact atmospheric water at all.)
And that would have lasted longer if something didn’t hit the sheet going several thousand miles an hour and melt a shitload of ice.
It’s also interesting how, at the end of the last glacial period, the great ice dams failed unleashing HUGE floods across the now-western states (see Missoula Flood and Bonneville Flood). Then things froze up again, the huge lakes re-formed, the ice dams broke again unleashing more gigantic floods. The flood waters were 500 feet deep flowing to the pacific scouring everything in their path. These massive freeze/thaw cycles happened several times.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.