Her DNA test with a private geneologist is the equivalent of Crowd Strike examining Hillary’s server. Why didn’t she send it to Ancestry?
>>Why didn’t she send it to Ancestry?
Same reason the secret service tries to protect the president’s DNA. So that no one could hack her ancestry dna, and find a way to leave that signature on some criminal scene for a crime of which she is TOTALLY innocent.
More likely so that if it came out with NO NA DNA, it could never be traced that she had the test. Now she has the expert saying she definitely HAS NA DNA. Just a stupid amount that Gateway Pundit is now saying is less than half the amount the average American has.
Genealogy vs DNA two different things. Genealogists do the begats...track ancestry and DNA is a tool to help them do it.
According to the report, it was a blind test. Supposedly they didn’t know it was Warren.
(Can we now call it the Warren Report ?)
https://mk0elizabethwarh5ore.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Bustamante_Report_2018.pdf
Bustamante didn’t do the test.He supervised.
There is no U.S. Native American database.
“For Native American references, we used samples within the 1000 Genomes project of Native American ancestry; these samples come from Mexico, Peru, and Colombia. (It is not possible to use Native American reference sequences from inside the United States, since Native American groups within the US have not chosen to participate in recent population genetics studies.)”
so she’s Peruvian ? or Mexican ? or Colombian ?
ftdna.com is the better one by a wide margin, imho.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There is absolutely NO DOUBT she already tried that, anonymously, and didn't get the answer she wanted.
So she reached out to the "Dr. Fraud Brigade."