No.
Bagster
Sorry, I just can’t take Q seriously. Too many wrong calls, most recently on Judge K.
I’m with you. Q is a prank, I suspect.
Then why are you on this thread??
No.
Bagster
That's just NOT very logical. The disinformation + errors are a tiny minority part of the whole.
Expectations are different for each person and probably expectations should be a consideration, when approaching Q.
I don’t see Q as a media personality, or a media show and I’m not saying Q critics do either, but QAnon is serving a need. They are an education team, and we’re allowed into an unfamiliar base of knowledge and strategy, for a change.
QAnon simply shares The Plan.
“The Plan” is the first, and frankly the only organized education effort going on anywhere, in America. (We know longer expect it in public schools, or academia.)
Q is a classroom for nerds and the curriculum is muscular and transparent.
Otherwise, we’re lost in opinion pieces, punditry, click bait and rabbit holes. With QAnon, everything is sustained until it’s understood, leading somewhere, and some very intelligent people are contributing to my learning curve.
The Plan has been laid out and effected. It is now SHOW TIME.
Q objectors may be unimpressed, or already know all this, perhaps, but I didn’t know it. Well, good for them, but my desire is to educate me, not them.
What “wrong call” did he make on Kavanaugh? They didn’t say he wouldn’t be confirmed.
Are you confusing what they post/release with Anon interpretations?
Was Q wrong at the time he said 53-47, or did subsequent events make it 51-49 (the score without the Daines mess.) Is it possible that after the Q post, Heidi Heitkamp looked at a poll where she was losing by 10 and decided not to end her career as a Democrat lobbyist. Is it also possible that Murkowski went back on her word to vote for Kavanaugh, perhaps in response to threats from Feinstein? Or that Joe Donnelly switched his vote because of similar bad polling?
We can’t know. It is not a valid Q “disproof”. Incorrect predictions are no more meaningful than guarantees of victory from Nate Silver. Yet Silver exists.
Meanwhile, there are a significant number of Q proofs, too many to be rationally disputed, including a sequence of recent posts timed exactly with Trump tweets.
~~~~~~~~~
We've all been on FR for a while -- and, frankly, I'm surprised by your closed-mindedness!
Apparently, you refer to the Q team's Tuesday, 2 October prediction of "53/47" for the Saturday, 6 October 50/48 vote.
Considering all the Dem insanity of the Ford/Kavanaugh hearingand details like...
...and Daines staying in AZ for his daughter's wedding, etc. -- I doubt that even McTurtle could have done better back on the 2nd...
Actually, your expectations from the Q team are absurd: "Q" is not a séance; the QTeam provides intel and a WH communication channel!
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I've always viewed you as reasonable, not petty. Why not, instead, take an unbiased look at some serious strategic planning and indisputable progress toward its implementation?
And, after you've done so, please do get back to me with feedback!
FRegards,
TXnMA
