[TXnMA]

"Sorry, I just can’t take Q seriously. Too many wrong calls, most recently on Judge K."

~~~~~~~~~

We've all been on FR for a while -- and, frankly, I'm surprised by your closed-mindedness!

Apparently, you refer to the Q team's Tuesday, 2 October prediction of "53/47" for the Saturday, 6 October 50/48 vote.

Considering all the Dem insanity of the Ford/Kavanaugh hearingand details like...

(DiChi browbeating Murkowski...)

...and Daines staying in AZ for his daughter's wedding, etc. -- I doubt that even McTurtle could have done better back on the 2nd...

Actually, your expectations from the Q team are absurd: "Q" is not a séance; the QTeam provides intel and a WH communication channel!

~~~~~~~~~~~~

I've always viewed you as reasonable, not petty. Why not, instead, take an unbiased look at some serious strategic planning and indisputable progress toward its implementation?

And, after you've done so, please do get back to me with feedback!

FRegards,
TXnMA
 

[Lazamataz]

I've always viewed you as reasonable, not petty. Why not, instead, take an unbiased look at some serious strategic planning and indisputable progress toward its implementation?

Because I don't have the time or energy to do a deep dive and/or fact check.

And because the little I have a 'gut feel' for -- that Sessions is Deep State -- is decried by Q.

[LS]

I’ve looked at Q for months. A palm reader could give me the same data. Sorry, not for me.