Posted on 09/30/2018 9:25:59 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
Where are Christine's parents in this? Are they dead? If not, why haven't they spoken up about how honorable their daughter is? Why is Christine so defensive about Chris Garrett, whom she was allegedly dating at the time of the incident? Why would 2 boys, that were friends with Garrett, attack his girlfriend?
Was the incident at Christine's house and not someone else's? Since the floor plan of the alleged house doesn't fit Christine's story, what's the floor plan look like of her childhood home?
Why hasn't ANY of the media tried to track down HER family for input?
“He said his friend has a very successful business now and will not come forward”
He may not have a choice if the investigators drop by. How many lives is this woman intent on destroying?
“Joe DiGenova said she was a loon, had all sorts of problems, and parents had to take her out of school and sent her away.”
When I heard Joe speak, he said the school made her go away.
“Who paid for the polygraph?”
Her pro bono lawyers paid for it. They stated it on the record during the hearings.
Polygraph was done at airport area hotel as stated. If thats true then hotel records could verify if she stayed there or her polygraph tech documented location of test. Someone at the hotel should remember such a setup done in a conference room. Otherwise this claim could be fake.
They don’t want to tell the truth about their daughter...she embarrasses them but she is blood.
New Democrat Standards apply to all 'conservative men':
"If we can do this to the Boy Scout Brett Kavanaugh, we can do it to anyone."
"Are you thinking of serving in a Republican administration? Or accepting an appointment to the federal judiciary from a Republican president? Think twice..."
"... our smear machine will reach back to middle school if necessary. If we can't find any dirt on you, we will manufacture some. There is no depth to which we will not stoop, and your honesty, integrity and spotless reputation are no match for our control over the media..."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3692178/posts
“I would also like to hear from her students.”
I think she doesn’t teach. Just does research. (What I’ve read, anyhow.)
Oh, I am sure she stayed overnight there, and I a sure that the polygraph was done in a hotel conference room.
My only question is whether she is the one who actually took the polygraph test.
Anyone using a scintilla of logic realizes that she is lying. Everything about this points towards one thing - a last minute attempt to keep BK off the SCOTUS. The fact that Feinstein and the dems sat on this since July and made no attempts top investigate until after the hearings were over, is proof this was a late minute hit job.
Could anyone who went through what she claimed she did, an attempt to rape her, not remember where the party was, the day it happened? What she does remember in an effort to corroborate her story, is that there were 4 other people there, including a close girlfriend, all of whom have signed statements under penalty of a felony, saying they were never at such a party. In fact, though she claims her friend was there and had met Kavanaugh a few times before, not just the night of the alleged attack, her friend said she never met him in her life!
The lie detector given by a democrat, in a hotel room, on the day of her grandmother’s funeral is a joke. She mentioned twice that it took a very long time, as per her lawyers instructions. This was a clear attempt to make it sound like it was thorough, she was asked a lot of questions. In fact they took most of the time creating a statement about what happened. While attached to the machine she actually only answered 2 very broad questions - Is any part of your written statement false? & Did you make any of it up? No direct questions like “Did BK pin you down and sexually assault you.? Did he put his hand over your mouth? Was Mark Judge in the room ? etc. They needed to show she passed a test. It was administered by someone picked by her lawyers, when it should have been someone picked by the committee.
Then there’s the lie about fear of travelling and the remodeling, which was done in 2008, not 2012. But they needed to make it 2012, because that’s when she told her therapist and in her statement she said she had never told her husband until after she told the therapist. The concocted that nonsense about demanding a second door and when her husband could figure out why, she opened up to him. The purpose of this lie, is the create the impression that even after all these years she was still traumatized by the event.
Then the insertion of the laughter into the story, so when asked she could say the most searing memory was their laughter. They kept asking her what she remembered from the attack, so she could go with the emotionally powerful line about the laughter. This was repeated ad nauseam on the MSM. Why, the image of two boys laughing while one of them is sexually assaulting a young girl, is more powerful than describing the actual attack as the most memorable part of it all.
Has anyone asked why there would be another boy in the room and why it was Mark Judge. How many guys try and “rape a women” with an eye witness in the room? The reason they added Judge was 1) to make it more revolting, two drunk punks having a good time attacking a young girl 2) Mark Judge has made public, long ago, his alcoholism and drug abuse. So if the public knows Judge had admitted he’s a drunk, it’s a logical conclusion he was drunk that night, along with BK.
Then there’s the thorough deletion of any social media or presence on the internet and burying her high school year books. They are hiding all her liberal activism, her ant-Trump invectives and probably her strong views on abortions.
They have been working very hard, to make what we do know seem innocuous. Her brother worked for the law firm that was involved in setting up the whole GPS Fusion scam. Quickly they say, it was 6 years ago. So what, he still has all the connections to the firm. She’s involved in the CIA internship program at Stanford. Immediately they take that off the site and say, she was only an affiliate. That doesn’t matter, maybe she didn’t head it up, as others have charged, but she clearly worked in the program.
The the whole issue of the research papers she did for the drug company Corcept Therapeutics. Corcept does make a drug known as Mifepristone, and Mifepristone is used in conjuction with other drugs for the abortion pill - RU486. Quickly they point out that the drug is not designed for that, its was developed to fight Cushings syndrome & diabetes. That’s fair, but it’s also NOW part of the abortion pill. The papers she wrote for the company have disappeared. If they are innocent research papers, why hide them?
So many other contradictions and questions unanswered... “Was there not a bathroom downstairs, why is music playing in a bedroom upstairs when the party is downstairs, etc. All the holes in her very carefully prepared lie and it’s carefully prepared presentation to the public.
Only a moron wouldn’t see this is an orchestrated hit, involving lawyers and a lot of people.
New Democrat Standards apply to all 'conservative men':
"If we can do this to the Boy Scout Brett Kavanaugh, we can do it to anyone."
"Are you thinking of serving in a Republican administration? Or accepting an appointment to the federal judiciary from a Republican president? Think twice..."
"... our smear machine will reach back to middle school if necessary. If we can't find any dirt on you, we will manufacture some. There is no depth to which we will not stoop, and your honesty, integrity and spotless reputation are no match for our control over the media..."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3692178/posts
Even more so when your two brothers are lawyers.
My theory is they don’t want to admit their sister/daughter/cousin has multiple personalities. 1) the real 52 year old grown adult college educated Dr. Ford, 2) 3 year old “pretty pose” confused Chrissy, and 3) the 12 year old boy who wrote that messy chicken scratched polygraph statement who didn’t know her first name and misspelled her last name. That could be why the polygraph guy only asked 2 bland questions and why Mitchell softballed and why the Committee interrupted ever 5 minutes to praise her bravery to keep her calm and focused on one personality.
I submit and suspect that yes she was molested, and it was someone in her family who did this to her. She is tormented by this family secret and has projected it onto Judge Kavanaugh. How many men are in prison by false accusations made by daughters or others who remembered false memories with the help of a therapist? Her family needs to be investigated and polygraphed if you will.
Are you putting us on? That's not your usual style gaijin -- have you got some links?
In a dark room, Bret Kavanaugh could easily be repressed-remembered for T-Bone, given the physical similarity between the two.
And maybe the guilt over the assault is what caused T-Bone to breakdown blubbering and slobbering on Booker's nice suit.
That behavior was totally out of character for a hardass street tough like T-Bone, and sounded more like something you'd expect in the sort of Lifetime movie a closeted doughy wealthy suburbanite might watch curled up on the couch in his senatorial jammies.
Can you be so sure she stayed at a hotel if no evidence? Im just saying produce the receipts or verify with hotels guest registration and the polygraph techs records. Hey its possible they brought in a 3 rd person to take the test as cover. Could be Deep State connected too.
That little squeaky mouse voice “pretty pose” Chrissy used can no way be her real persona. Her college students would have eaten her alive years ago. As a prof, she’d bound to have youtubes of lectures, presentations and workshops. There is no other reason than her real voice for those to have been scrubbed.
No biography obituary. No graveyard. A gathering and memorial service with no times listed. Very very strange.
Differing political views is no reason for her to not immediately go to her brothers for legal advice on this case or tell the family while there for granny’s funeral (and longer).
The funeral was on the 6th. Her lawyers thought she was going to head back to CA (as indicated by the Fineswine letter and the polygraph guy’s interview) so they scrambled and called the polygraph guy that night. He had to rearrange his schedule and called them back he could do it the next morning at her hotel near the airport.
It is being reported that friends have written letters of support but other than a couple of names in print, none have come on camera. The trend here is imaginary party and imaginary friends.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.