I'm with you. She had a thankless task. No matter what she did, how she acted, the derps would say that she beat up on the victim.
She walked the fine line very well. Her questions related to facts, not feelings. And when she caught Edsel in a lie, she didn't go all Perry Mason, she just made a note and moved on. In an amazing testament to critical thinking, not many paid attention to how she deftly got Edsel to point out her own inaccuracies. All without fireworks and posturing.
In an amazing testament to critical thinking, not many paid attention to how she deftly got Edsel to point out her own inaccuracies.
That’s what I heard she said in an interview that people don’t get. Her job as a prosecutor is to build her case, and she does that not by firing scary questions, but by asking lots of innocuous sounding ones to establish inconsistencies.
I loved it each time Rachell said “OK”. It had no emotion but was sweet and carried a lot of weight. I smiled each time I heard it. Based on her report, I think Fraud was assaulted in College.
About the two doors. Fraud put in a second door because she fantasized that Mark Judge would again appear on the other side. ya know, the Safe Way.(LOL)