1 posted on
09/24/2018 4:22:51 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
09/24/2018 4:23:47 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
3 posted on
09/24/2018 4:23:50 PM PDT by
Publius
To: BenLurkin
5 posted on
09/24/2018 4:26:47 PM PDT by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: BenLurkin
6 posted on
09/24/2018 4:30:54 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: BenLurkin
but it remains to be formally and indisputably proved out to infinity.
= = =
Using Demoncrat logic, it IS true; prove it is not.
7 posted on
09/24/2018 4:31:42 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(You know that I am full of /S)
To: BenLurkin
However, Riemann’s formula only holds if one assumes that the real parts of these zeta function zeroes are all equal to one-half. Reimann proved this property for the first few primes, and over the past century it has been computationally shown to work for many large numbers of primes, but it remains to be formally and indisputably proved out to infinity.
Me and my Friday night bowling buddies have been discussing this theory for several years now. I think we're close to a solution and the million dollar prize......
8 posted on
09/24/2018 4:32:45 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(I once found a needle in a haystack but it wasn't the one I was looking for...)
To: BenLurkin
John Derbyshire, formerly of the National Review, wrote a very readable book about this topic called
Prime Obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics (2003).
Dr. Michael Atiyah is the mathematician making the claim. It would be surprising if this 89 year old man really did come up with a proof. Must mathematical breakthroughs are the efforts of much younger men. I guess if this old guy is right, then their is hope for everyone!
10 posted on
09/24/2018 4:33:50 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
("Nature, Mr. Allnut, is what we are put in this world to rise above.")
To: BenLurkin
Andrew Beal (a Lansing area kid who grew up into a rocket builder, after a career in banking) has endowed a $1 million prize for a proof for his Beal Conjecture, btw. I mean, a couple of million might be nice to have.
11 posted on
09/24/2018 4:37:07 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
To: BenLurkin
Infinity Squared.
Check Mate!
.
If you can double infinity
and double it again you’ll
Need a lot of paper to write
down all the Prime numbers.
.
How about infinity times infinity ¿
14 posted on
09/24/2018 4:59:47 PM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(Despised by the Despicable!)
To: BenLurkin
can anyone here help me
understand analytic continuation?
15 posted on
09/24/2018 5:08:15 PM PDT by
RockyTx
To: BenLurkin
“It is simply too vague and unspecific.”
16 posted on
09/24/2018 5:21:54 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: BenLurkin
22 posted on
09/24/2018 6:55:26 PM PDT by
thinden
To: BenLurkin
28 posted on
09/25/2018 8:32:01 AM PDT by
Big Red Badger
(Despised by the Despicable!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson