Fact. Grassley is a courtly, decent man, a Republican of the old school.
Fact. Grassley has been rolled by the Democrats multiple times during his Committee leadership years.
Fact. Grassley is out of his depth.
What you are watching is NOT a "Grassley-is-giving-'em-enough-rope-to-hang-themselves" deliberate strategy.
1998
So grassley got rolled by the Dems, and you claim that is proof of what?
You don’t even make any sense. If he was working with the Dems why would they need it “roll” him, derp?
Fact. Q seems to know more than you.
When Q was saying to trust Sessions, POTUS was resigned to the fact that Sessions needed to prove himself, so the fallback position was “TRUST SESSIONS”.
Q was reflecting POTUS’s view of Sessions.
When POTUS stepped up his criticisms of Sessions in August starting with the Fox Ainsley Earhardt interview, Q had gone silent with any direct reference to trust Sessions.
The long and short is that Q reflects POTUS.
When Q says “TRUST GRASSLEY” it means POTUS is seeing what Gressley will do.
This is Trump.
It means Trump is watching what Grassley will do before he acts to declassify.
Now thinking ahead, the FISA declassification will probably be stopped by a court order pushed through by the Democrats, With the court split 4-4, POTUS may be frustrated from declassifying. I know POTUS has every authority to declassify, but so he also had the authority to issue travel bans but that did not stop the obstructionism.
So the game plan is to stop Kavanaugh at all cost, keep Mueller in position, then have the House impeach on obstruction in some way. That has been the plan all along.
Here’s a bullet list:
* Derail Kavanaugh
* Court order to suspend FISA declas
* Keep RR, keep Mueller
* Press for obstruction
* Move to impeach