Skip to comments.
Nevada brothel workers fight back against the rise of 'dehumanizing and dangerous' sex robots [tr]
UK Daily Mail ^
| September 20, 2018
| Staff
Posted on 09/20/2018 6:14:50 AM PDT by C19fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Women hate competition.
1
posted on
09/20/2018 6:14:50 AM PDT
by
C19fan
To: C19fan
Anyone with a monopoly does.
2
posted on
09/20/2018 6:17:28 AM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: C19fan
People never cease to amaze me.
3
posted on
09/20/2018 6:19:02 AM PDT
by
wally_bert
(Terrific! Terrific? Harve Nyquist never ordered any radials.)
To: Lazamataz
4
posted on
09/20/2018 6:21:23 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Bender2
5
posted on
09/20/2018 6:21:40 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: C19fan
Women hate competition.
Absolutely, and as these robots become more and more realistic in the decades to come, women - not just feminists - will be at the forefront of demanding that they be banned. They already are.
To: C19fan
You should see how vicious women get when they actually start fighting each other...
To: C19fan
In today’s world where the man is automatically guilty and practically needs a third party witness and a signed contract, particularly college campuses, a sex robot is a lot more safe than a biological woman.
8
posted on
09/20/2018 6:26:20 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: C19fan
This is actually why women hate prostitutes.
9
posted on
09/20/2018 6:28:46 AM PDT
by
fruser1
To: C19fan
They say the dolls are dehumanizing, encourage violence against women Bzzzt, wrong. They're actually concerned that the increasingly realistic robots will eventually result the ignoring of women. And to women, nothing is more frightening than that.
10
posted on
09/20/2018 6:30:14 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
Afraid of genuine competition?....at least more genuine than whores and a lot of wives....
11
posted on
09/20/2018 6:32:31 AM PDT
by
TnTnTn
To: C19fan
Nope, nothing “dehumanizing and dangerous” about prostitution.
12
posted on
09/20/2018 6:38:05 AM PDT
by
Fido969
(In!)
To: Morpheus2009
13
posted on
09/20/2018 6:39:24 AM PDT
by
Big Red Badger
(Despised by the Despicable!)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Wait until someone splices the brain DNA of a golden retriever into the body DNA of Christie Brinkley. The human race as we know it dies when those pets go on sale.
14
posted on
09/20/2018 6:52:53 AM PDT
by
Reeses
(A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
To: C19fan
I, for one, welcome our sex robot overlords.
15
posted on
09/20/2018 6:57:49 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
To: C19fan
Offering your body for money is dehumanizing and dangerous.
To: Truth29
Yes. It is a very simple risk/reward consideration.
To: Truth29
In today’s world where the man is automatically guilty and practically needs a third party witness and a signed contract, particularly college campuses, a sex robot is a lot more safe than a biological woman.
It’s really quite sad to read that, however on the other hand, there is an awful lot of truth in your statement.
To: Truth29
The movie “Cherry 2000” involved a man seeking spare parts for his sexbot/companion.
The scene in the night club where people negotiate the contracts for sexual encounters was a comic-horror at the time but may end up being prescient.
19
posted on
09/20/2018 7:30:53 AM PDT
by
tbw2
To: C19fan
No one should be surprised at the automation of unskilled and semi-skilled labor.
20
posted on
09/20/2018 7:33:24 AM PDT
by
sphinx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson