“””:: But Huber is prevented by the 6th Ammendment from prosecuting anyone outside his pre-established jurisdiction. It’s quite clear language. So no hope of prosecutions there. ::
There is a problem here. Maybe bitt can find it? Hint: “anyone”.”””
Why AG Sessions Chose Outside Prosecutors Over a Special Counsel
March 30, 2018 by Jeff Carlson, CFA
Twenty-third Amendment
“While perceived as politically neutral and only somewhat liberal-leaning at the time of passage in 1961, the District swung dramatically toward the Democratic Party in the years after passage. African-Americans voted in greater numbers than they had in the 1940s and 1950s with the clearing away of restrictions on the vote, and their share of the District electorate increased - according to the 1970 census, 71% of the Federal District was black, a dramatic jump.[8] Accordingly, the District has sent its 3 electoral votes to the Democratic candidate in every single presidential election since 1964, including the 1984 landslide re-election of President Reagan, where only the District of Columbia and Minnesota voted for Democratic candidate Walter Mondale. The District’s electoral votes have yet to prove decisive in a presidential election. The smallest Electoral College majority won by a Democratic president since the Twenty-third Amendment’s ratification was the 56 vote majority achieved by Jimmy Carter in 1976. “
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-third_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Add into that that, by design and regulation, ALL secure communications pass through the NSA servers housed in....
UTAH!
The article you referenced conflates the investigation with prosecution. Huber and Horrowitz can conduct investigations as to crimes committed outside Huber’s jurisdiction. However, they cannot prosecute anyone.
6th ammendment:
” In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law...(etc.)
“which district shall have been previously ascertained by law” means you can’t simply extend someone’s jurisdiction after a crime was committed.
It is very clear.