[mac_truck]

Microcip was debunked days ago when one of his faked messages contained a link to an article that hadn't even been published yet.

Q-anon never had a date glitch in any of his posts?

[BlessedBeGod]

Q-anon never had a date glitch in any of his posts?

A link to an article that doesn't exist yet isn't a "date glitch."

[grey_whiskers]

Not what happened, San Fran. (Trolly, get it?)

The *time stamp* on the supposed message (which wouldn't have been typed in by hand by Microchip)...was two days earlier than a hypertext link with the date built in.

Neither one generated by the poster.

And therefore, the post must be fake.

Only *possible* exception is that the dead tree version of weekly newsmagazines sometimes shows up at news stands a day or two early (post-date printed on cover).

If the magazine folks do the same crap with e-columns, it just might be he had a heads up from the publisher and grabbed the link without looking.

But I doubt it. Look up the post yourself, and find the link to the article.

Click through, and then go to the home page and then the "Contact us". Ask them if they ever pre-date articles before web publication?

[philman_36]

Q-anon never had a date glitch in any of his posts?

The way this should go is you go out and find a date glitch (whatever that is).
Then, if you find one, you bring it back here and it gets discussed.

Something along the lines of..."Hey everybody, look what I found."

Get it?
Or was your question simply rhetorical?