Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Discovered: Optimal magnetic fields for suppressing instabilities in tokamaks
phys.org ^

Posted on 09/11/2018 6:19:50 AM PDT by BenLurkin

A long-time puzzle in the effort to capture the power of fusion on Earth is how to lessen or eliminate a common instability that occurs in the plasma called edge localized modes (ELMs). Just as the sun releases enormous bursts of energy in the form of solar flares, so flare-like bursts of ELMs can slam into the walls of doughnut-shaped tokamaks that house fusion reactions, potentially damaging the walls of the reactor.

To control these bursts, scientists disturb the plasma with small magnetic ripples called resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) that distort the smooth, doughnut shape of the plasma—releasing excess pressure that lessens or prevents ELMs from occurring. The hard part is producing just the right amount of this 3-D distortion to eliminate the ELMs without triggering other instabilities and releasing too much energy that, in the worst case, can lead to a major disruption that terminates the plasma.

...

Physicist Jong-Kyu Park of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), working with a team of collaborators from the United States and the National Fusion Research Institute (NFRI) in Korea, have successfully predicted the entire set of beneficial 3-D distortions for controlling ELMs without creating more problems. Researchers validated these predictions on the Korean Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR) facility, one of the world's most advanced superconducting tokamaks, located in Daejeon, South Korea.

Researchers reduced the complexity of the calculations when they realized that the number of ways the plasma can distort is actually far fewer than the range of possible 3-D fields that can be applied to the plasma. By working backwards, from distortions to 3-D fields, the authors calculated the most effective fields for eliminating ELMs. The KSTAR experiments confirmed the predictions with remarkable accuracy.

(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: fusion; magnets; tokamak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: bk1000

That’s Hedey


21 posted on 09/11/2018 7:15:57 AM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

and framistats.


22 posted on 09/11/2018 7:32:06 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (My "White Privilege" is my work ethic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They have probably considered this, but how about getting away from the thermal conversion process, heating water to produce steam to turn turbines, and use the plasma movement to induce a current via magnetic coupling. The power can be transferred via the magnetic field.

The problem might be the erratic nature of the induced current. But can be overcome.


23 posted on 09/11/2018 7:32:11 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

magnetic field containment was very important in the deployment of the nether regions.


24 posted on 09/11/2018 7:33:42 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Twenty-five years ago, I was reading articles on fusion reactors and how this would be a major source of power in... twenty-five years.

I just read another article the other day that was talking about fusion being a reality in... you guessed it... 25 years.

25 posted on 09/11/2018 7:36:24 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Those with intellect bear the burden of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Necessity is the mother of invention? Fusion us not a priority for us.


26 posted on 09/11/2018 7:45:16 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Thorium.
The long term answer to safe nuclear power.
It just doesn’t go “boom!”


27 posted on 09/11/2018 7:51:55 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1
😉
28 posted on 09/11/2018 8:00:33 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Is this going to mess with my etch-a- sketch?


29 posted on 09/11/2018 8:05:59 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

It isn’t as dangerous as you might think. IF we got fusion working, in the event of a containment failure, it would certainly destroy things in the immediate vicinity of the reactor, but it isn’t a city-busting event. Without the pressure of the containment field, the plasma would very quickly dissipate. Unhealthy to stand beside in the event of a failure, to be sure. But no Chernobyl.


30 posted on 09/11/2018 8:11:16 AM PDT by ferret_airlift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
have successfully predicted the entire set of beneficial 3-D distortions for controlling ELMs without creating more problems.

"Predicted"... so, computer models... Unfortunately, reality often has other plans. I wouldn't count on this just yet.

31 posted on 09/11/2018 8:16:35 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
"Fusion us not a priority for us."

Priority or not, the U.S. has sunk tens of billions of dollars into this research. Sure would be nice if we got some results.

32 posted on 09/11/2018 8:28:39 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Those with intellect bear the burden of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Agreed. Like cancer, we have put billions into research and have little to show for it. I am not very confident in scientists.


33 posted on 09/11/2018 8:33:11 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71

Warning! Do not look into laser with remaining eye.


34 posted on 09/11/2018 8:37:24 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

Necessity is the mother of invention?

No, that was Zappa.


35 posted on 09/11/2018 8:39:36 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This is a breakthrough. Now fusion power will only be 20 years away.


36 posted on 09/11/2018 8:41:23 AM PDT by TheNext (Anonymous Source)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
It does make one wonder, doesn't it? Sometimes it seems like there's just too much money to be made in preserving the problem.

On the subject of cancer, yes, that's something else I've heard the same tired platitudes bandied about for over half a century. Nothing has changed.

But on that front, I do believe there are advances in treatment that we 'little people' just aren't privy to. An example of this is a friend of mine who died a couple of years ago at age 65, of the same exact type of brain cancer that ex-President Jimmy Carter had. He went overseas and was cured in a matter of months. My friend, lacking that special treatment, died horribly.

Tells you things.

37 posted on 09/11/2018 8:44:55 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Those with intellect bear the burden of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

It has always struck me as an oddity of science that we
are using nuclear power to boil water.

If we only could do that and make a reactor small enough
to weigh less than a tender of coal, steam trains could
make a comeback.

A direct nuclear to electric should be possible too.


38 posted on 09/11/2018 8:48:20 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Priority or not, the U.S. has sunk tens of billions of dollars into this research. Sure would be nice if we got some results.

Well at least they haven't turned it into a giant Muslim outreach program.

39 posted on 09/11/2018 8:50:51 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (If your church believes in evolution it is not a Christian church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Thus problem with the Tokamak is why they are developing the Stellarator. This is on my Facebook page... so sorry if you are Facebook challenged.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10155187110820108&id=100864590107


40 posted on 09/11/2018 8:55:55 AM PDT by PresidentFelon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson